ArticleBMJ open2011
The polypill in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: cost-effectiveness in the Dutch population.
Article in BMJ open, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- The efficacy and tolerability of 'polypills': meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.PloS one · 2012Pooled it
- Cost-effectiveness of a stepwise cardiometabolic disease prevention program: results of a randomized controlled trial in primary care.BMC medicine · 2021Trial
- Randomized Polypill crossover trial in people aged 50 and over.PloS one · 2012 · on this mapTrial
- Polypills in the Management of Cardiovascular Risk-A Perspective.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024 · on this mapArticle
- Polypill versus medication monotherapy in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases in Iran: An economic evaluation study.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Ranking Preventive Interventions from Different Policy Domains: What Are the Most Cost-Effective Ways to Improve Public Health?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Prevention of non-communicable disease: best buys, wasted buys, and contestable buys.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2020Article
- Polypill: an affordable strategy for cardiovascular disease prevention in low-medium-income countries.Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease · 2018Review
- Review
- Article
- Cost-benefit analysis of the polypill in the primary prevention of myocardial infarction and stroke.European journal of epidemiology · 2016Article
- Choosing an epidemiological model structure for the economic evaluation of non-communicable disease public health interventions.Population health metrics · 2016Article
- Challenges in modelling the cost effectiveness of various interventions for cardiovascular disease.PharmacoEconomics · 2014Review
- Single-pill combinations: a therapeutic option or necessity for vascular risk treatment?Journal of drug assessment · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives The aim of the present study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the polypill in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Design A health economic modelling study. Setting Primary healthcare in the Netherlands. Participants Simulated individuals from the general Dutch population, aged 45-75 years. Interventions Opportunistic screening followed by prescription of the polypill to eligible individuals. Eligibility was defined as having a minimum 10-year risk of cardiovascular death as assessed with the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation function of alternatively 5%, 7.5% or 10%. Different versions of the polypill were considered, depending on composition: (1) the Indian polycap, with three different types of blood pressure-lowering drugs, a statin and aspirin; (2) as (1) but without aspirin and (3) as (2) but with a double statin dose. In addition, a scenario of (targeted) separate antihypertensive and/or statin medication was simulated. Primary outcome measures Cases of acute myocardial infarction or stroke prevented, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained and the costs per QALY gained. All interventions were compared with usual care. Results All scenarios were cost-effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio between €7900 and 12 300 per QALY compared with usual care. Most health gains were achieved with the polypill without aspirin and containing a double dose of statins. With a 10-year risk of 7.5% as the threshold, this pill would prevent approximately 3.5% of all cardiovascular events. Conclusions Opportunistic screening based on global cardiovascular risk assessment followed by polypill prescription to those with increased risk offers a cost-effective strategy. Most health gain is achieved by the polypill without aspirin and a double statin dose.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.