Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22188898›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2011

Estimating the mode of inheritance in genetic association studies of qualitative traits based on the degree of dominance index.

Elias Zintzaras, Mauro Santos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Discrepancies of RET gene and risk of differentiated thyroid carcinoma.Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers · 2022
    Article
  11. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Association ofJournal of biosciences · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The -938C>A Polymorphism inDisease markers · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elias ZintzarasDepartment of Biomathematics, University of Thessaly School of Medicine, 2 Panepistimiou Str, Biopolis, Larissa 41110, Greece. zintza@med.uth.gr
Mauro Santos

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe biological justification for the choice of the genetic mode in genetic association studies (GAS) is seldom available. Then, the mode of inheritance is approximated by investigating a number of non-orthogonal genetic contrasts making the interpretation of results difficult.

methodsWe propose to define the mode of inheritance by the significance of the deviance of the co-dominant contrast and the degree of dominance (h), which is a function of two orthogonal contrasts (the co-dominant and additive). Non-dominance exists when the co-dominant contrast is non-significant and, hence, the risk effect of heterozygotes lies in the middle of the risk of the two homozygotes. Otherwise, dominance (including over- and under-dominance) is present and the direction of dominance depends on the value of h.

resultsSimulations show that h may capture the real mode of inheritance and it is affected by deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE). In addition, power for detecting significance of h when the study conforms to HWE rule increases with the degree of dominance and to some extent is related to the mutant allele frequency.

conclusionThe introduction of the degree of dominance provides useful insights into the mode of inheritance in GAS.

Indexed as

Genes, DominantGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseCase-Control StudiesGene FrequencyGenetics, PopulationHeterozygoteHomozygoteHumansLinkage DisequilibriumModels, StatisticalPedigreePredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID22188898
PMCPMC3299619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.