Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22188651›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2011

A genome-wide linkage study of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer.

Celia M T Greenwood, Andrew D Paterson, Linda Linton, Irene L Andrulis, Carmel Apicella, Apostolos Dimitromanolakis, Valentina Kriukov, Lisa J Martin, Ayesha Salleh, Elena Samiltchuk and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Genetic Variation and Hot Flashes: A Systematic Review.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Celia M T GreenwoodProgram in Genetics & Genome Biology, The Hospital for Sick Children, 101 College Street, East Tower, Toronto, ON M5G 1L7, Canada.
Andrew D Paterson
Linda Linton
Irene L Andrulis
Carmel Apicella
Apostolos Dimitromanolakis
Valentina Kriukov
Lisa J Martin
Ayesha Salleh
Elena Samiltchuk
Rashmi V Parekh
Melissa C Southey
Esther M John
John L Hopper
Norman F Boyd
Johanna M Rommens

Funding

ONTARIO REGISTRY FOR STUDIES OF FAMILIAL BREAST CANCERU01CA069467 · NCI · CANCER CARE ONTARIO · PI ANDRULIS, IRENE L. · 1995 to 2010
$10.4M
THE AUSTRALIAN BREAST CANCER FAMILY REGISTRYU01CA069638 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI HOPPER, JOHN L · 1995 to 2010
$6.6M
Genetic studies of mammographic densityR01CA102659 · NCI · HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHLDRN (TORONTO) · PI ROMMENS, JOHANNA M · 2005 to 2009
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS CA102659NCI NIH HHS RFA-CA-06-503NCI NIH HHS U01 CA69467NCI NIH HHS U01 CA69638PHS HHS HHSN268200782096C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMammographic breast density is a highly heritable (h2 > 0.6) and strong risk factor for breast cancer. We conducted a genome-wide linkage study to identify loci influencing mammographic breast density (MD).

methodsEpidemiological data were assembled on 1,415 families from the Australia, Northern California and Ontario sites of the Breast Cancer Family Registry, and additional families recruited in Australia and Ontario. Families consisted of sister pairs with age-matched mammograms and data on factors known to influence MD. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping was performed on 3,952 individuals using the Illumina Infinium 6K linkage panel.

resultsUsing a variance components method, genome-wide linkage analysis was performed using quantitative traits obtained by adjusting MD measurements for known covariates. Our primary trait was formed by fitting a linear model to the square root of the percentage of the breast area that was dense (PMD), adjusting for age at mammogram, number of live births, menopausal status, weight, height, weight squared, and menopausal hormone therapy. The maximum logarithm of odds (LOD) score from the genome-wide scan was on chromosome 7p14.1-p13 (LOD = 2.69; 63.5 cM) for covariate-adjusted PMD, with a 1-LOD interval spanning 8.6 cM. A similar signal was seen for the covariate adjusted area of the breast that was dense (DA) phenotype. Simulations showed that the complete sample had adequate power to detect LOD scores of 3 or 3.5 for a locus accounting for 20% of phenotypic variance. A modest peak initially seen on chromosome 7q32.3-q34 increased in strength when only the 513 families with at least two sisters below 50 years of age were included in the analysis (LOD 3.2; 140.7 cM, 1-LOD interval spanning 9.6 cM). In a subgroup analysis, we also found a LOD score of 3.3 for DA phenotype on chromosome 12.11.22-q13.11 (60.8 cM, 1-LOD interval spanning 9.3 cM), overlapping a region identified in a previous study.

conclusionsThe suggestive peaks and the larger linkage signal seen in the subset of pedigrees with younger participants highlight regions of interest for further study to identify genes that determine MD, with the goal of understanding mammographic density and its involvement in susceptibility to breast cancer.

Indexed as

Absorptiometry, PhotonGenetic LinkageMammographyAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFamily CharacteristicsFemaleGenetic MarkersGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansLod ScoreMiddle AgedPhenotypeRisk FactorsGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID22188651
PMCPMC3326574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.