ArticleThe Milbank quarterly2011
Galvanizers, guides, champions, and shields: the many ways that policymakers use public health researchers.
Article in The Milbank quarterly, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research evidence use in local government-led public health interventions: a systematic review.Health research policy and systems · 2023Pooled it
- A systematic review of frameworks for the interrelationships of mental health evidence and policy in low- and middle-income countries.Health research policy and systems · 2018Pooled it
- A systematic review of barriers to and facilitators of the use of evidence by policymakers.BMC health services research · 2014Pooled it
- Political and institutional influences on the use of evidence in public health policy. A systematic review.PloS one · 2013Pooled it
- Translating one health research evidence into action: co-production of rabies control knowledge in Côte d'Ivoire.Health research policy and systems · 2026Article
- Maximizing researcher-policymaker engagement in global public health.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- Enablers and barriers for policymaker engagement in health research from the perspective of policymakers: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Analysis of the Awareness and Access of Eye Healthcare in Underserved Populations.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- How governments influence public health research: a scoping review.Health promotion international · 2025Article
- How integrated knowledge translation worked to reduce federal policy barriers to the implementation of medication abortion in Canada: a realist evaluation.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
- Rethinking Barriers and Enablers in Qualitative Health Research: Limitations, Alternatives, and Enhancements.Qualitative health research · 2024Article
- A stakeholder perspective on the necessary conditions for successfully implementing parenting interventions in Botswana.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Determinants of using children's mental health research in policymaking: variation by type of research use and phase of policy process.Implementation science : IS · 2021Article
- How was research engaged with and used in the development of 131 policy documents? Findings and measurement implications from a mixed methods study.Implementation science : IS · 2019Article
- Incorporating social dimensions in planning, managing and evaluating environmental projects.Environmental management · 2019Article
- Deconstructing knowledge brokering for commissioned rapid reviews: an observational study.Health research policy and systems · 2018Observational
- Improving research and policy interactions requires a better understanding of what works in different contexts.Israel journal of health policy research · 2018Article
- How to convene an international health or development commission: ten key steps.Health policy and planning · 2018Article
- Does engagement predict research use? An analysis of The Conversation Annual Survey 2016.PloS one · 2018Article
- Policymakers' experience of a capacity-building intervention designed to increase their use of research: a realist process evaluation.Health research policy and systems · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextPublic health researchers make a limited but important contribution to policy development. Some engage with policy directly through committees, advisory boards, advocacy coalitions, ministerial briefings, intervention design consultation, and research partnerships with government, as well as by championing research-informed policy in the media. Nevertheless, the research utilization literature has paid little attention to these diverse roles and the ways that policymakers use them. This article describes how policymakers use researchers in policymaking and examines how these activities relate to models of research utilization. It also explores the extent to which policymakers' accounts of using researchers concur with the experiences of "policy-engaged" public health researchers.
methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with thirty-two Australian civil servants, parliamentary ministers, and ministerial advisers identified as "research-engaged" by public health researchers. We used structured and inductive coding to generate categories that we then compared with some of the major research utilization models.
findingsPolicymakers were sophisticated and multifaceted users of researchers for purposes that we describe as Galvanizing Ideas, Clarification and Advice, Persuasion, and Defense. These categories overlapped but did not wholly fit with research utilization models. Despite the negative connotation, "being used" was reported as reciprocal and uncompromising, although researchers and policymakers were likely to categorize these uses differently. Policymakers countered views expressed by some researchers. That is, they sought robust dialogue and creative thinking rather than compliance, and they valued expert opinion when research was insufficient for decision making. The technical/political character of policy development shaped the ways in which researchers were used.
conclusionsElucidating the diverse roles that public health researchers play in policymaking, and the multiple ways that policymakers use these roles, provides researchers and policymakers with a framework for negotiating and reflecting on activities that may advance the public health goals shared by both.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.