Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22187334›Full record

ArticleClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2012

Mechanisms and pathophysiology of autoimmune disease.

Wesley H Brooks

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The challenge of treating orphan disease.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2014
    Article
  3. Molecular mechanisms in autoimmune type 1 diabetes: a critical review.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2014
    Review
  4. Everything is autoimmune until proven otherwise.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2013
    Review
  5. Autoimmunity in 2012.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2013
    Review
  6. Smell and autoimmunity: a comprehensive review.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2013
    Review
  7. Is integrative medicine the next new frontier in medicine?Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2013
    Article
  8. Cutting-edge issues in autoimmunity and allergy of the digestive system.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Wesley H BrooksExperimental HTS Core, SRB-3, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612-9416, USA. wesley.brooks@moffitt.org

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first textbook on autoimmunity was published by Ian Mackay and McFarland Burnett in 1963. It was the first attempt to summarize existing knowledge on human autoimmunity. Since that time, there have been tens of thousands of experimental papers and numerous textbooks that focus on the diagnosis and treatment of human autoimmunity. There have been at least as many, if not more, directed at similar issues in animal models. Enormous strides have been made not only in diagnosis, but also in the pathophysiology and especially in treatment. We have gone from the era of simple HLA typing to deep sequencing and, more recently, epigenetic analysis. We have gone from the era of white blood cell differentials to detailed lymphoid phenotyping. We have gone from the era of simple antinuclear antibodies to detailed and sophisticated immunodiagnosis with recombinant autoantigens and disease-specific epitopes. We have gone from the era of using only corticosteroids to selective biologic agents. Diseases that were previously considered idiopathic are now very much understood as autoimmune. We are in the era of autoinflammatory reactions and the concept of both innate versus adaptive immunity in mediating immunopathology. In this edition of Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology, we focus on key and cutting-edge issues in the pathophysiology of autoimmunity. The issues are very much oriented and driven by hypothesis, i.e., a prediction of events expected to occur based on observations. It is not meant to be a complete summary of potential mechanisms of autoimmunity, but rather an attempt to accelerate discussion and better understanding. The primary goal is obviously to help our patients with autoimmune disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutoimmune DiseasesAutoimmunityHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.