Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22187263›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2012

Intergenerational change and familial aggregation of body mass index.

Paul C D Johnson, Jennifer Logue, Alex McConnachie, Niveen M E Abu-Rmeileh, Carole Hart, Mark N Upton, Mike Lean, Naveed Sattar, Graham Watt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Body mass index in parents and their adult offspring: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Epigenomics, gestational programming and risk of metabolic syndrome.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2015
    Review
  15. Article
  16. The Generation R Study: Biobank update 2015.European journal of epidemiology · 2014
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The Rotterdam Study: 2014 objectives and design update.European journal of epidemiology · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Paul C D JohnsonRobertson Centre for Biostatistics, Boyd Orr Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Jennifer Logue
Alex McConnachie
Niveen M E Abu-Rmeileh
Carole Hart
Mark N Upton
Mike Lean
Naveed Sattar
Graham Watt

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between parental BMI and that of their adult offspring, when increased adiposity can become a clinical issue, is unknown. We investigated the intergenerational change in body mass index (BMI) distribution, and examined the sex-specific relationship between parental and adult offspring BMI. Intergenerational change in the distribution of adjusted BMI in 1,443 complete families (both parents and at least one offspring) with 2,286 offspring (1,263 daughters and 1,023 sons) from the west of Scotland, UK, was investigated using quantile regression. Familial correlations were estimated from linear mixed effects regression models. The distribution of BMI showed little intergenerational change in the normal range (<25 kg/m(2)), decreasing overweightness (25-<30 kg/m(2)) and increasing obesity (≥30 kg/m(2)). Median BMI was static across generations in males and decreased in females by 0.4 (95% CI: 0.0, 0.7) kg/m(2); the 95th percentile increased by 2.2 (1.1, 3.2) kg/m(2) in males and 2.7 (1.4, 3.9) kg/m(2) in females. Mothers' BMI was more strongly associated with daughters' BMI than was fathers' (correlation coefficient (95% CI): mothers 0.31 (0.27, 0.36), fathers 0.19 (0.14, 0.25); P = 0.001). Mothers' and fathers' BMI were equally correlated with sons' BMI (correlation coefficient: mothers 0.28 (0.22, 0.33), fathers 0.27 (0.22, 0.33). The increase in BMI between generations was concentrated at the upper end of the distribution. This, alongside the strong parent-offspring correlation, suggests that the increase in BMI is disproportionally greater among offspring of heavier parents. Familial influences on BMI among middle-aged women appear significantly stronger from mothers than fathers.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexFamilyAdultCohort StudiesEnvironmentFemaleHealth SurveysHeredityHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedObesityOverweightRegression AnalysisScotland

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.