Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22186969›Full record

Trial reportClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2012

Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (ERICCA): rationale and study design of a multi-centre randomized double-blinded controlled clinical trial.

Derek J Hausenloy, Luciano Candilio, Chris Laing, Gudrun Kunst, John Pepper, Shyam Kolvekar, Richard Evans, Steve Robertson, Rosemary Knight, Cono Ariti and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01247545 (Effect of Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning on Clinical Outcomes in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01247545 phase3completednot on this map

Effect of Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning on Clinical Outcomes in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College, LondonRan2010 to 2015Enrolled1,612ConditionsCoronary Heart DiseaseArmsRemote ischaemic preconditioning, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Derek J HausenloyThe Hatter Cardiovascular Institute, University College London, London, UK.
Luciano Candilio
Chris Laing
Gudrun Kunst
John Pepper
Shyam Kolvekar
Richard Evans
Steve Robertson
Rosemary Knight
Cono Ariti
Tim Clayton
Derek M Yellon
ERICCA Trial Investigators
University of London · GBRoyal London Hospital · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GBKing's College London · GBUCL Australia · AU

Funding

British Heart FoundationMedical Research Council MC_G1002673
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNovel cardioprotective strategies are required to improve clinical outcomes in high risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) ± valve surgery. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIC), in which brief episodes of non-lethal ischemia and reperfusion are applied to the arm or leg, has been demonstrated to reduce perioperative myocardial injury following CABG ± valve surgery. Whether RIC can improve clinical outcomes in this setting is unknown and is investigated in the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on clinical outcomes (ERICCA) trial in patients undergoing CABG surgery. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01247545).

methodsThe ERICCA trial is a multicentre randomized double-blinded controlled clinical trial which will recruit 1,610 high-risk patients (Additive Euroscore ≥ 5) undergoing CABG ± valve surgery using blood cardioplegia via 27 tertiary centres over 2 years. The primary combined endpoint will be cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization and stroke at 1 year. Secondary endpoints will include peri-operative myocardial and acute kidney injury, intensive care unit and hospital stay, inotrope score, left ventricular ejection fraction, changes of quality of life and exercise tolerance. Patients will be randomized to receive after induction of anesthesia either RIC (4 cycles of 5 min inflation to 200 mmHg and 5 min deflation of a blood pressure cuff placed on the upper arm) or sham RIC (4 cycles of simulated inflations and deflations of the blood pressure cuff). IMPLICATIONS: The findings from the ERICCA trial have the potential to demonstrate that RIC, a simple, non-invasive and virtually cost-free intervention, can improve clinical outcomes in higher-risk patients undergoing CABG ± valve surgery.

Indexed as

Coronary Artery BypassPostoperative ComplicationsDouble-Blind MethodHumansIschemic Preconditioning, MyocardialMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryQuality of LifeReperfusion InjuryResearch DesignStrokeStroke VolumeTreatment OutcomeTroponin TVentricular Function, LeftTroponin T

Identifiers

PMID22186969
OpenAlexW1978959635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.