Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22186097›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in organ transplantation2012

Significance of T helper 17 immunity in transplantation.

Farida Abadja, Bara Sarraj, Mohammed J Ansari

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in organ transplantation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Deciphering the Complexity of the Immune Cell Landscape in Kidney Allograft Rejection.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Hashimoto's thyroiditis and renal transplant rejection.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2023
    Article
  7. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Farida AbadjaComprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Bara Sarraj
Mohammed J Ansari
Northwestern University · US

Funding

Role of Novel Th17 cells in allograft rejection and toleranceK08AI080836 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI ANSARI, MOHAMMED JAVEED · 2009 to 2013
$631k
NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI080836NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI080836-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe aim of this review is to provide an overview of significance of T helper 17 (Th17) immunity in acute, chronic and antibody-mediated allograft rejection. The role of Th17 immunity in development of de-novo autoimmunity following transplantation is outlined. It will also consider the impact of Th17 immunity on transplantation tolerance. Potential therapies to target Th17 immunity are discussed. RECENT

findingsInterleukin17 (IL-17) is produced by a wide variety of immune and non-immune cells in response to injury. IL-17 production by tubular epithelial cells in response to complement activation in acute antibody-mediated rejection may perpetuate immune injury. Th17-dependent de-novo autoimmunity contributes to chronic allograft rejection. Targeting IL-17 not only inhibits Th17 immunity but also attenuates Th1 immunity by affecting the initial recruitment of immune cells to sites of inflammation and modulates innate and adaptive immune responses that ultimately lead to tissue destruction. SUMMARY: Th17 immunity is now beginning to be appreciated as a set of responses mediated not only by CD4 Th17 cells but a variety of immune cells and a plethora of cytokines that collaborate to mediate immune disorders, including transplant rejection. Development and contribution of de-novo autoimmunity to chronic rejection is increasingly appreciated. The developmental plasticity of Tregs and Th17 cells is a major hurdle to Treg-based cellular therapies for transplantation. Several biologics targeting Th17 immunity are under evaluation for autoimmune disease. It remains to be determined whether these can be used in transplantation to improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAutoimmunityCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesChronic DiseaseGraft RejectionHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInterleukin-17Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaTh17 CellsT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryTransplantation, HomologousTransplantation ToleranceImmunosuppressive AgentsInterleukin-17Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-delta

Identifiers

PMID22186097
PMCPMC3539809
OpenAlexW1998642568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.