Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22185446›Full record

ReviewFuture cardiology2012

The epicardium as a candidate for heart regeneration.

Nicola Smart, Paul R Riley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future cardiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The Vascular Niche for Adult Cardiac Progenitor Cells.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Epicardium-Derived Tbx18Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Promoting Cardiac Regeneration and Repair Using Acellular Biomaterials.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The epicardium as a hub for heart regeneration.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola SmartMolecular Medicine Unit, UCL-Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street, London, WC1N 1EH, UK.
Paul R Riley
Risk & Policy Analysts (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/08/004/23625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian heart loses its regenerative capacity during early postnatal stages; consequently, individuals surviving myocardial infarction are at risk of heart failure due to excessive fibrosis and maladaptive remodeling. There is an urgent need, therefore, to develop novel therapies for myocardial and coronary vascular regeneration. The epicardium-derived cells present a tractable resident progenitor source with the potential to stimulate neovasculogenesis and contribute de novo cardiomyocytes. The ability to revive ordinarily dormant epicardium-derived cells lies in the identification of key stimulatory factors, such as Tβ4, and elucidation of the molecular cues used in the embryo to orchestrate cardiovascular development. myocardial infarction injury signaling reactivates the adult epicardium; understanding the timing and magnitude of these signals will enlighten strategies for myocardial repair.

Indexed as

Coronary VesselsExtracellular MatrixHumansMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumMyocytes, CardiacPericardiumRegenerative MedicineSignal TransductionStem CellsThymosinThymosin beta(4)Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor AThymosinThymosin beta(4)Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID22185446
PMCPMC3977139
OpenAlexW2170460732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.