SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2012
Instruments to assess patients with rotator cuff pathology: a systematic review of measurement properties.
Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Wearable systems for shoulder kinematics assessment: a systematic review.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2019Pooled it
- Metallic versus biodegradable suture anchors for rotator cuff repair: a case control study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2019Trial
- Structured Wii protocol for rehabilitation of shoulder impingement syndrome: A pilot study.Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine · 2017Trial
- Scapular Kinematics and Patterns of Scapular Dyskinesis in Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Histological, radiological and clinical analysis of the supraspinatus tendon and muscle in rotator cuff tears.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- Role of biomechanical assessment in rotator cuff tear repair: ArthroscopicWorld journal of orthopedics · 2021Article
- Genetic factors in rotator cuff pathology: potential influence of col 5A1 polymorphism in outcomes of rotator cuff repair.BMC medical genetics · 2020Article
- Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome questionnaires for patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the shoulder.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019Article
- Arthroscopic Latarjet for Recurrent Shoulder Instability.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019Article
- Conservative Rehabilitation Provides Superior Clinical Results Compared to Early Aggressive Rehabilitation for Rotator Cuff Repair: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2019Article
- A Systematic Summary of Systematic Reviews on the Topic of the Rotator Cuff.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2018Review
- Missed fractures of the greater tuberosity.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2018Article
- The effect of lipid levels on patient-reported outcomes in patients with rotator cuff tears.JSES open access · 2017Article
- Creation of a core outcome set for clinical trials of people with shoulder pain: a study protocol.Trials · 2017Review
- Deltoid muscle tropism does not influence the outcome of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.Musculoskeletal surgery · 2016Article
- A validation of the Swedish version of the WORC index in the assessment of patients treated by surgery for subacromial disease including rotator cuff syndrome.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2016Article
- Turkish version of the Rotator Cuff Quality of Life questionnaire in rotator cuff-impaired patients.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2015Article
- Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Spanish version of the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in patients with chondral lesion of the knee.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe aims of this study were to obtain an overview of the methodological quality of studies on the measurement properties of rotator cuff questionnaires and to describe how well various aspects of the design and statistical analyses of studies on measurement properties are performed.
methodsA systematic review of published studies on the measurement properties of rotator cuff questionnaires was performed. Two investigators independently rated the quality of the studies using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments checklist. This checklist was developed in an international Delphi consensus study.
resultsSixteen studies were included, in which two measurement instruments were evaluated, namely the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index and the Rotator Cuff Quality-of-Life Measure. The methodological quality of the included studies was adequate on some properties (construct validity, reliability, responsiveness, internal consistency, and translation) but need to be improved on other aspects. The most important methodological aspects that need to be developed are as follows: measurement error, content validity, structural validity, cross-cultural validity, criterion validity, and interpretability.
conclusionConsidering the importance of adequate measurement properties, it is concluded that, in the field of rotator cuff pathology, there is room for improvement in the methodological quality of studies measurement properties. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22183737What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.