ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2012
Biology of retinoschisin.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retinal organoids with X-linked retinoschisis RS1 (E72K) mutation exhibit a photoreceptor developmental delay and are rescued by gene augmentation therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Article
- How to Set Up Genetic Counselling for Inherited Macular Dystrophies: Focus on Genetic Characterization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Morphological and functional parameters in X-linked retinoschisis patients-A multicentre retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical manifestation and current therapeutics in X-juvenile retinoschisis.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2022Article
- Review
- Retinoschisin Facilitates the Function of L-Type Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2017Article
- An ex vivo gene therapy approach in X-linked retinoschisis.Molecular vision · 2016Article
- Retinal Gene Therapy: Current Progress and Future Prospects.Expert review of ophthalmology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.