Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22183175›Full record

ArticleClinical rheumatology2012

Acceptability and practicality of pGALS in screening for rheumatic disease in Malawian children.

Eve Smith, Elizabeth Molyneux, Geert Tom Heikens, Helen Foster

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Eve SmithPaediatric Rheumatology, Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, England, UK. evemdsmith@yahoo.co.uk
Elizabeth Molyneux
Geert Tom Heikens
Helen Foster
Great North Children's Hospital · GBNIHR Oxford Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre · GBQueen Elizabeth Central Hospital · MWUniversity of Malawi · MW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pGALS (paediatric Gait, Arms, Legs, Spine) Musculoskeletal (MSK) screen is validated in English-speaking school-aged children and has been shown to be useful in acute paediatric practice in the UK. The aim of this study is to evaluate the practicality and acceptability of pGALS in children in an acute hospital setting in Malawi. School-aged inpatients and children presenting to the Queen Elizabeth Hospital Blantyre, Malawi, participated. Practicality (time taken, degree of completion) and patient/parent assessed acceptability (time take, discomfort) were assessed using a 'smiley face' visual analogue scale. Fifty-one children (median age 8 years) were assessed; 23 out of 51 (45%) in the emergency department and the remainder were inpatients. Most presentations were infection or trauma related (n = 35, 69%). Practicality of pGALS was good [median time to complete pGALS--4 min (range 1.8-7.4)] and completed in 48 out of 51 children (94%). Acceptability was high; 98% of parents considered the time taken to be acceptable, 84% of children deemed little/no additional discomfort. Abnormalities using pGALS were found in 21 out of 51 (41%), mostly in the lower limbs. The pGALS MSK screen was practical and acceptable in this acute setting. Abnormal findings were common.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMalawiMaleMass ScreeningPediatricsRheumatic Diseases

Identifiers

PMID22183175
OpenAlexW2042518835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.