ReviewSurgery today2012
Systematic comparison of cervical and extra-cervical surgical approaches for endoscopic thyroidectomy.
Review in Surgery today, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of total endoscopic thyroidectomy with conventional open thyroidectomy for treatment of papillary thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Pooled it
- Subcutaneous dissection area contributes less to endoscopic thyroidectomy-related invasiveness.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Trial
- Safety and cosmesis of gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy: a retrospective study.Updates in surgery · 2024Article
- Robotic thyroidectomy using gas-insufflation one-step single-port transaxillary (GOSTA) approach.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Article
- Comparison of cosmetic outcomes between remote-access and conventional thyroidectomy: A review of the current literature.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2023Review
- Gasless, endoscopic trans-axillary thyroid surgery: our series of the first 51 human cases.World journal of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- Extracervical Approaches to Thyroid Surgery: Evolution and Review.Minimally invasive surgery · 2019Review
- Comparison of conventional thyroidectomy and endoscopic thyroidectomy via axillo-bilateral breast approach in papillary thyroid carcinoma patients.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Article
- Endoscopic thyroidectomy for differentiated thyroid cancer.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the clinical application of different surgical approaches for endoscopic thyroidectomy and provide more rational treatment criteria.
methodsCollect all randomized controlled trials, multi-center studies, clinical controlled trials, clinical trials and other comparative studies of endoscopic thyroidectomy with a large sample size in different databases through an established search strategy, make a systematic analysis of all the included literature.
resultsThis study selected 12 publications for analysis from more than 800 articles: these included six publications describing cervical thyroidectomy (A) and six publications describing extra-cervical thyroidectomy (B). Conversion to open surgery occurred in 29 patients in group A and only 4 in group B (p < 0.001). The patients in group A experienced shorter hospital stays than patients in group B (1.90 ± 0.80 vs. 4.03 ± 0.99 days, p < 0.001), and there was shorter operating time in group A (p < 0.001). Hemorrhage occurred in 3 cases in group A and 8 cases in group B (p = 0.04), Seroma occurred in 25 cases in group B but in no cases in group A (p < 0.001). Postoperative cosmetic results evaluated by verbal response scales (VRS) registered showed: group A (3.35 ± 0.60) and group B (3.74 ± 0.50; p < 0.001). Other complications such as recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and hypocalcemia showed no significant differences.
conclusionsEvaluation of the different surgical approaches for endoscopic thyroidectomy shows that the incidence of hemorrhage and seroma are higher in the extra-cervical group, but the rate of conversion to conventional open surgery is significantly higher in the cervical group. Furthermore, patients who undergo extra-cervical endoscopic thyroidectomy are associated with longer operating time and hospital stays; however, these studies suggest that the extra-cervical surgical approach for endoscopic thyroidectomy is preferable for dealing with more kinds of thyroid tumor and leaving no scars on neck.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22183049What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.