Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22180804›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2011

Risk factors for ocular chlamydia after three mass azithromycin distributions.

Berhan Ayele, Teshome Gebre, Jeanne Moncada, Jenafir I House, Nicole E Stoller, Zhaoxia Zhou, Travis C Porco, Bruce D Gaynor, Paul M Emerson, Julius Schachter and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Community Hand-Dug Wells for Trachoma: A Cluster-Randomized Trial.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2021
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Importance of including borderline cases in trachoma grader certification.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2014
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Trachoma risk factors in Oromia Region, Ethiopia.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Trachoma: an update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment.Current opinion in ophthalmology · 2012
    Review
  14. An eye for azithromycin: review of the literature.Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Berhan AyeleThe Carter Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Teshome Gebre
Jeanne Moncada
Jenafir I House
Nicole E Stoller
Zhaoxia Zhou
Travis C Porco
Bruce D Gaynor
Paul M Emerson
Julius Schachter
Jeremy D Keenan
San Francisco Foundation · USThe Carter Center · ETUniversity of California, San Francisco · USCarter Center · US

Funding

CTSA: K12 COMPONENTKL2RR024130 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JOHNSTON, S. CLAIBORNE · 2006 to 2011
$19.3M
TANA IIU10EY016214 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LIETMAN, THOMAS M · 2004 to 2013
$4.4M
Optimal trachoma control after mass antibiotic distributionsK23EY019071 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI KEENAN, JEREMY DAVID · 2008 to 2012
$982k
NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024130NEI NIH HHS K23 EY019071NEI NIH HHS K23EY019071NEI NIH HHS U10 EY016214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn important component of the World Health Organization's comprehensive trachoma elimination strategy is the provision of repeated annual mass azithromycin distributions, which are directed at reducing the burden of ocular chlamydia. Knowledge of characteristics associated with infection after mass antibiotic treatments could allow trachoma programs to focus resources to those most likely to be infected with ocular chlamydia. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe monitored 12 communities in rural Ethiopia that had received 3 annual mass azithromycin treatments as part of a cluster-randomized trial for trachoma. One year after the third treatment, a random sample of children from each village received conjunctival examination for follicular trachomatous inflammation (TF) and intense trachomatous inflammation (TI), conjunctival swabbing for chlamydial RNA and DNA, and a household survey. The primary outcome for this study was RNA evidence of ocular chlamydia, which we detected in 41 of 573 swabbed children (7.2%, 95%CI 2.7-17.8). In multivariate mixed effects logistic regression models, ocular chlamydial RNA was significantly associated with ocular discharge (OR 2.82, 95%CI 1.07-7.42), missing the most recent mass azithromycin treatment (OR 2.49, 95%CI 1.02-6.05), having a sibling with ocular chlamydia (OR 4.44, 95%CI 1.60-12.29), and above-median community population (OR 7.81, 95%CI 1.56-39.09). Ocular chlamydial infection was also independently associated with TF (OR 3.42, 95%CI 1.56-7.49) and TI (OR 5.39, 95%CI 2.43-11.98). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: In areas with highly prevalent trachoma treated with multiple rounds of mass azithromycin, trachoma programs could consider continuing mass azithromycin treatments in households that have missed prior mass antibiotic treatments, in households with clinically active trachoma, and in larger communities.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinChildChild, PreschoolChlamydia trachomatisCross-Sectional StudiesDNA, BacterialEthiopiaFamily CharacteristicsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleOdds RatioRisk FactorsRNA, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinDNA, BacterialRNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID22180804
PMCPMC3236733
OpenAlexW2150310688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.