Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22180178›Full record

ArticleCancer2012

NRAS mutation status is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic melanoma.

John A Jakob, Roland L Bassett, Chaan S Ng, Jonathan L Curry, Richard W Joseph, Gladys C Alvarado, Michelle L Rohlfs, Jessie Richard, Jeffrey E Gershenwald, Kevin B Kim and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 348 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
348citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
20.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

348 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 685 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

288 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John A JakobDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Roland L Bassett
Chaan S Ng
Jonathan L Curry
Richard W Joseph
Gladys C Alvarado
Michelle L Rohlfs
Jessie Richard
Jeffrey E Gershenwald
Kevin B Kim
Alexander J Lazar
Patrick Hwu
Michael A Davies
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center SPORE in MelanomaP50CA093459 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI GRIMM, ELIZABETH A · 2004 to 2014
$23.7M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA093459NCI NIH HHS P50 CA93459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a need for improved prognostic markers in melanoma. In this study, the authors tested the prognostic significance and clinicopathologic correlations of v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) and neuroblastoma RAS viral (v-ras) oncogene homolog (NRAS) mutations in patients with metastatic melanoma.

methodsClinical and pathologic data were collected retrospectively on melanoma patients who were clinically tested for BRAF (exon 15) and NRAS (exons 1 and 2) mutations at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Analyses were performed to identify significant associations of mutations with tumor and patient characteristics and with survival from the diagnosis of stage IV disease.

resultsThe genotypes of the full cohort (n = 677) were 47% BRAF mutation, 20% NRAS mutation, and 32% wild-type for BRAF and NRAS ("WT"). Tumor mutation status was associated (P = .008) with the risk of central nervous system involvement at the diagnosis of stage IV disease, with a higher prevalence observed in BRAF-mutant (24%) and NRAS-mutant (23%) patients than in WT patients (12%). Among patients with nonuveal melanoma who underwent mutation testing within 6 months of stage IV diagnosis (n = 313), patients with NRAS mutations had a median survival of 8.2 months from stage IV diagnosis, which was shorter than the median survival of WT patients (15.1 months; P = .004). Multivariate analysis of this population incorporating age, sex, metastases (M1) category, serum lactate dehydrogenase level, and mutation status confirmed that NRAS mutations are associated independently with decreased overall survival (vs WT; P = .005; hazard ratio, 2.05).

conclusionsPatients with BRAF or NRAS mutations were more likely than WT patients to have central nervous system involvement at the time they were diagnosed with distant metastatic disease. NRAS mutation status was identified as an independent predictor of shorter survival after a diagnosis of stage IV melanoma.

Indexed as

Genes, rasMutationFemaleGene FrequencyHumansMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafSkin NeoplasmsBRAF protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf

Identifiers

PMID22180178
PMCPMC3310961
OpenAlexW2056199226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.