Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22179781›Full record

ReviewMycopathologia2012

Cryptococcus gattii comparative genomics and transcriptomics: a NIH/NIAID White Paper.

V Chaturvedi, W C Nierman

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mycopathologia, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

V ChaturvediNew York State Department of Health, Wadsworth Center, Albany, NY, USA. vishnu@wadsworth.org
W C Nierman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryptococcus gattii is an emerging global pathogen. Recent reports suggest that C. gattii cryptococcosis is more common in immunocompetent as well as HIV-infected AIDS patients than earlier estimated. An ongoing outbreak of C. gattii in Vancouver, Canada, and the US Pacific Northwest has heightened public health awareness in North America. We have few clues as to what causes emergence or re-emergence of highly pathogenic strains, why C. gattii split up from its sibling pathogen C. neoformans, why it thrives in trees instead, and why immunocompetent individuals are vulnerable to this pathogen? C. gattii comprises of four distinct lineages, but the information on the genome of C. gattii is inadequate and unrepresentative as it is limited to two strains, R265 and WM276, which are MATα, serotype B, genotype VGII/VGI from Canada and Australia, respectively. There is a wide gap in knowledge about the genomes of VGIII and VGIV strains, serotype C strains, and MATa strains. The geographical representation is inadequate in the absence of strains from California, South America, Asia, and Africa. Additional obstacles to work with this pathogen are the following: (a) complex molecular typing schemes and (b) lack of functional genomics analyses. We propose to complete genome sequencing of 12 reference strains by next-generation sequencing technology and to map their transcriptomes by RNA-Seq technology. This effort would lead to new resources for the scientific community including (1) insight from additional C. gattii genomes to anchor future research studies, (2) validation of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for molecular typing to improve epidemiology studies, and (3) transcript analyses from strains under relevant pathogenic and non-pathogenic conditions to accelerate the discovery of proteins for diagnostics, drug targets, and vaccines.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingGenomicsAnimalsCryptococcus gattiiDNA, FungalEnvironmental MicrobiologyGenome, FungalHumansSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Fungal

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.