Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22179756›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2012

Different expression systems for production of recombinant proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Zihe Liu, Keith E J Tyo, José L Martínez, Dina Petranovic, Jens Nielsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Truncation ofSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. EngineeringEngineering microbiology · 2024
    Review
  12. Microorganisms · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zihe LiuDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Keith E J Tyo
José L Martínez
Dina Petranovic
Jens Nielsen

Funding

Systems Analysis of the Unfolded Protein response in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeF32GM083647 · NIGMS · CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY · PI TYO, KEITH EDWARD JAGGARD · 2008 to 2009
$94k
European Research Council 247013NIGMS NIH HHS F32 GM083647
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has become an attractive cell factory for production of commodity and speciality chemicals and proteins, such as industrial enzymes and pharmaceutical proteins. Here we evaluate most important expression factors for recombinant protein secretion: we chose two different proteins (insulin precursor (IP) and α-amylase), two different expression vectors (POTud plasmid and CPOTud plasmid) and two kinds of leader sequences (the glycosylated alpha factor leader and a synthetic leader with no glycosylation sites). We used IP and α-amylase as representatives of a simple protein and a multi-domain protein, as well as a non-glycosylated protein and a glycosylated protein, respectively. The genes coding for the two recombinant proteins were fused independently with two different leader sequences and were expressed using two different plasmid systems, resulting in eight different strains that were evaluated by batch fermentations. The secretion level (µmol/L) of IP was found to be higher than that of α-amylase for all expression systems and we also found larger variation in IP production for the different vectors. We also found that there is a change in protein production kinetics during the diauxic shift, that is, the IP was produced at higher rate during the glucose uptake phase, whereas amylase was produced at a higher rate in the ethanol uptake phase. For comparison, we also refer to data from another study, (Tyo et al. submitted) in which we used the p426GPD plasmid (standard vector using URA3 as marker gene and pGPD1 as expression promoter). For the IP there is more than 10-fold higher protein production with the CPOTud vector compared with the standard URA3-based vector, and this vector system therefore represent a valuable resource for future studies and optimization of recombinant protein production in yeast.

Indexed as

Genetic VectorsPlasmidsalpha-AmylasesBiotechnologyGene ExpressionInsulinInsulin SecretionPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein EngineeringProtein Sorting SignalsRecombinant ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaealpha-AmylasesInsulinProtein Sorting SignalsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22179756
PMCPMC4128558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.