Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22179464›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2012

Extending the limitations of liver surgery: outcomes of initial human experience in a high-volume center performing single-port laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Guruprasad S Shetty, Young Kyoung You, Ho Joong Choi, Gun Hyung Na, Tae Ho Hong, Dong-Goo Kim

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Single incision laparoscopic surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Comparison of conventional versus single port laparoscopy for surgical treatment of gynecological diseases: a pilot study.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Clinical advantages of single port laparoscopic hepatectomy.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Single port laparoscopic liver surgery: A minireview.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2016
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Single incision laparoscopic liver resection (SILL) - a systematic review.GMS Interdisciplinary plastic and reconstructive surgery DGPW · 2015
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guruprasad S ShettyDivision of Hepatobiliary-Pancreas Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 505 Banpo-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul 137-701, Korea.
Young Kyoung You
Ho Joong Choi
Gun Hyung Na
Tae Ho Hong
Dong-Goo Kim
Catholic University of Korea · KRSeoul St. Mary's Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSingle-port laparoscopic surgery is slowly but steadily gaining popularity among surgeons performing minimally invasive abdominal surgeries. The aim of the present study is to assess our initial experience with single-port laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

methodsBetween March 2009 and April 2011, 24 patients underwent single-port laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Of these, 13 were laparoscopic segmentectomies, 4 were laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomies, 1 was a right hepatectomy, 1 was a left hepatectomy, and 4 were nonanatomical resections.

resultsMedian operating time and blood loss were 205 min (95-545 min) and 500 ml (100-2,500 ml), respectively. Two procedures were converted to multiport laparoscopic hepatectomy due to instrument length limitations, and four were converted to open surgery. There were no serious intraoperative or postoperative complications in this series. Median postoperative stay was 8.5 days (5-16 days).

conclusionsAlthough the procedure requires a lot of technical expertise added to the skill of liver surgery, single-port laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma seems a feasible approach in a variety of well-selected cases. In spite of the demanding nature of the procedure and the requirement of better instrumentation for single-port laparoscopic surgery, the results seem to compare favorably with conventional laparoscopic surgery and open surgery.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, HepatocellularEquipment DesignFeasibility StudiesFemaleHepatectomyHumansLaparoscopesLaparoscopyLength of StayLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, Local

Identifiers

PMID22179464
OpenAlexW2147914289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.