ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2012
Sacrohysteropexy followed by successful pregnancy and eventual reoperation for prolapse.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of childbirth on pelvic floor dysfunction in women who have undergone previous pelvic floor reconstructive surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.International urogynecology journal · 2024Pooled it
- The Surgical Challenge of the Repeat Sacrocolpopexy.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Pregnancy After Uterine-Preserving Prolapse Surgery: Obstetric Outcomes and Prolapse Recurrence Following Native Tissue and Mesh-Augmented Repairs.International urogynecology journal · 2026Review
- Pregnancy After Laparoscopic Hysteropexy: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Determinants of Dissatisfaction After Laparoscopic Cure of Vaginal and/or Rectal Prolapse using Mesh: a Comprehensive Retrospective Cohort Study.International urogynecology journal · 2024Article
- Article
- Pregnancy outcomes after abdominal sacrocervicopexy.International urogynecology journal · 2022Article
- Successful Pregnancy Outcome After Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse.Cureus · 2021Article
- Effect of pregnancy on uterine-sparing pelvic organ prolapse repair.International urogynecology journal · 2020Article
- Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence using robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2020Article
- Pregnancy management in laparoscopic promontofixation patients: a challenging situation with no clear recommendations.The Pan African medical journal · 2020Article
- Pregnancy following laparoscopic hysteropexy-a case series.Gynecological surgery · 2017Article
- Uterine sparing surgical methods in pelvic organ prolapse.Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2015Review
- Pregnancy and Vaginal Delivery after Sacrohysteropexy.Case reports in obstetrics and gynecology · 2015Article
- Pregnancy After a Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy: a Case Report.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2014Article
- Management options for women with uterine prolapse interested in uterine preservation.Current urology reports · 2013Review
- Robot-assisted surgery:--impact on gynaecological and pelvic floor reconstructive surgery.International urogynecology journal · 2012Review
- Uterine-sparing Robot-assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women Aiming for Pregnancy.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A multitude of uterine-sparing prolapse repairs exist in the literature, but little is published on subsequent pregnancy and long-term success following a repair. A 35-year-old gravida 2 para 2 underwent laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy and suburethral sling for stage III prolapse and stress urinary incontinence. She conceived 6 months postprocedure. Her antepartum course was complicated by third trimester pelvic pressure--successfully managed with a pessary. She delivered via cesarean section at term. At 12 months postpartum she had no signs of prolapse. Two years postpartum, she reprolapsed and underwent robotic assisted laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, sacrocolpopexy, and perineorrhaphy. Two years postoperatively she remained without any prolapse symptoms. Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy is a reasonable surgical option for patients with pelvic organ prolapse considering future pregnancies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.