ReviewPlant cell reports2012
Recent progress in the understanding of tissue culture-induced genome level changes in plants and potential applications.
Review in Plant cell reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
69 citing papers in PubMed.
- The combination of morphogenic regulators BABY BOOM and GRF-GIF improves maize transformation efficiency and promotes leaf regeneration.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Species-Specific Metabolic Identities Persist in Fabaceae Callus Cultures Under Standardized Culture Conditions.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- CRISPR-enabled functional genomics for bolstering plant tolerance to abiotic and biotic stress; a comprehensive review.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
- Detection of differential DNA methylation in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) vitroplants using whole genome bisulfite sequencing analysis.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Genome degradation in plant tissue culture.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Strain, procedures, and tools for reproducible genetic transformation and genome editing of the emerging plant model Spirodela polyrhiza.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Efficient callus induction and regeneration of tea plant (Camellia sinensis).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Smart nanocarriers for plant genetic engineering.Plant communications · 2025Article
- Isolation and Transfection of Nicotiana benthamiana Mesophyll Protoplasts.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Induction of stigma-like structures in saffron (Crocus sativus L.): Exploring factors and metabolite analysis.PloS one · 2025Article
- Unlocking regeneration potential: harnessing morphogenic regulators and small peptides for enhanced plant engineering.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Review
- Global characterization of somatic mutations and DNA methylation changes during vegetative propagation in strawberries.Genome research · 2024Article
- Article
- Comparative transcriptome and functional analyses provide insights into the key factors regulating shoot regeneration in highbush blueberry.Horticulture research · 2024Article
- Somatic embryogenesis from mature sorghum seeds: An underutilized genome editing recipient system.Heliyon · 2024Article
- An insight into tissue culture-induced variation origin shared between anther culture-derived triticale regenerants.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Regulatory roles of noncoding RNAs in callus induction and plant cell dedifferentiation.Plant cell reports · 2023Review
- Small RNAs and Karma methylation in Elaeis guineensis mother palms are linked to high clonal mantling.Plant molecular biology · 2023Article
- Triticale doubled haploid plant regeneration factors linked by structural equation modeling.Journal of applied genetics · 2022Article
- Accelerated Domestication of New Crops: Yield is Key.Plant & cell physiology · 2022Article
9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In vitro cell and tissue-based systems have tremendous potential in fundamental research and for commercial applications such as clonal propagation, genetic engineering and production of valuable metabolites. Since the invention of plant cell and tissue culture techniques more than half a century ago, scientists have been trying to understand the morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular changes associated with tissue culture responses. Establishment of de novo developmental cell fate in vitro is governed by factors such as genetic make-up, stress and plant growth regulators. In vitro culture is believed to destabilize the genetic and epigenetic program of intact plant tissue and can lead to chromosomal and DNA sequence variations, methylation changes, transposon activation, and generation of somaclonal variants. In this review, we discuss the current status of understanding the genomic and epigenomic changes that take place under in vitro conditions. It is hoped that a precise and comprehensive knowledge of the molecular basis of these variations and acquisition of developmental cell fate would help to devise strategies to improve the totipotency and embryogenic capability in recalcitrant species and genotypes, and to address bottlenecks associated with clonal propagation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22179259What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.