Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22178868›Full record

ArticleMutation research2012

Single-walled carbon nanotube-induced mitotic disruption.

L M Sargent, A F Hubbs, S-H Young, M L Kashon, C Z Dinu, J L Salisbury, S A Benkovic, D T Lowry, A R Murray, E R Kisin and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mutation research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 168 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Current research trends of nanomedicines.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Epigenetic Effects of Nanomaterials and Nanoparticles.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

L M SargentNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV 26505, United States. lqs1@cdc.gov
A F Hubbs
S-H Young
M L Kashon
C Z Dinu
J L Salisbury
S A Benkovic
D T Lowry
A R Murray
E R Kisin
K J Siegrist
L Battelli
J Mastovich
J L Sturgeon
K L Bunker
A A Shvedova
S H Reynolds
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USRJ Lee Group (United States) · USWest Virginia University · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

Lung Oxidative Stress/Inflammation By Carbon NanotubesR01OH008282 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KAGAN, VALERIAN E · 2005 to 2014
$2.8M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NIOSH CDC HHS OH008282NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH008282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes were among the earliest products of nanotechnology and have many potential applications in medicine, electronics, and manufacturing. The low density, small size, and biological persistence of carbon nanotubes create challenges for exposure control and monitoring and make respiratory exposures to workers likely. We have previously shown mitotic spindle aberrations in cultured primary and immortalized human airway epithelial cells exposed to 24, 48 and 96 μg/cm(2) single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT). To investigate mitotic spindle aberrations at concentrations anticipated in exposed workers, primary and immortalized human airway epithelial cells were exposed to SWCNT for 24-72 h at doses equivalent to 20 weeks of exposure at the Permissible Exposure Limit for particulates not otherwise regulated. We have now demonstrated fragmented centrosomes, disrupted mitotic spindles and aneuploid chromosome number at those doses. The data further demonstrated multipolar mitotic spindles comprised 95% of the disrupted mitoses. The increased multipolar mitotic spindles were associated with an increased number of cells in the G2 phase of mitosis, indicating a mitotic checkpoint response. Nanotubes were observed in association with mitotic spindle microtubules, the centrosomes and condensed chromatin in cells exposed to 0.024, 0.24, 2.4 and 24 μg/cm(2) SWCNT. Three-dimensional reconstructions showed carbon nanotubes within the centrosome structure. The lower doses did not cause cytotoxicity or reduction in colony formation after 24h; however, after three days, significant cytotoxicity was observed in the SWCNT-exposed cells. Colony formation assays showed an increased proliferation seven days after exposure. Our results show significant disruption of the mitotic spindle by SWCNT at occupationally relevant doses. The increased proliferation that was observed in carbon nanotube-exposed cells indicates a greater potential to pass the genetic damage to daughter cells. Disruption of the centrosome is common in many solid tumors including lung cancer. The resulting aneuploidy is an early event in the progression of many cancers, suggesting that it may play a role in both tumorigenesis and tumor progression. These results suggest caution should be used in the handling and processing of carbon nanotubes.

Indexed as

AneuploidyCell CycleCells, CulturedCell SurvivalHumansMitosisNanotubes, CarbonRespiratory MucosaSpindle ApparatusNanotubes, Carbon

Identifiers

PMID22178868
PMCPMC4696046
OpenAlexW2050083788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.