Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22178420›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2012

A view of nuclear Polycomb bodies.

Vincenzo Pirrotta, Hua-Bing Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Female Aging Affects Coilin Pattern in Mouse Cumulus Cells.Journal of developmental biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Nuclear architecture and the structural basis of mitotic memory.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Review
  20. Emerging Implications of Phase Separation in Cancer.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Vincenzo PirrottaDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA. pirrotta@biology.rutgers.edu
Hua-Bing Li
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

The switch between epigenetically silenced and active chromatin statesR01GM082918 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI PIRROTTA, VINCENZO · 2010 to 2013
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM082918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polycomb group (PcG) proteins are concentrated in nuclear foci called PcG bodies. Although some of these foci are due to the tendency of PcG binding sites in the genome to occur in linear clusters, distant PcG sites can contact one another and in some cases congregate in the same PcG body when they are repressed. Experiments using transgenes containing PcG binding sites reveal that co-localization depends on the presence of insulator elements rather than of Polycomb Response Elements (PREs) and that it can occur also when the transgenes are in the active state. A model is proposed according to which insulator proteins mediate shuttling of PcG target genes between PcG bodies when repressed to transcription factories when transcriptionally active.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell NucleusGenomeHumansPolycomb-Group ProteinsProtein BindingProtein BiosynthesisRepressor ProteinsRNA InterferencePolycomb-Group ProteinsRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22178420
PMCPMC3329586
OpenAlexW2049070625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.