Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22178327›Full record

ReviewExperimental neurology2013

Marijuana, endocannabinoids, and epilepsy: potential and challenges for improved therapeutic intervention.

Mackenzie E Hofmann, Charles J Frazier

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Traumatic Brain Injury Outcomes After Recreational Cannabis Use.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Crosstalk between the MCellular signalling · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Cellular Mechanisms of Action of Drug Abuse on Olfactory Neurons.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Cannabidiol: promise and pitfalls.Epilepsy currents · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mackenzie E HofmannDepartment of Pharmacodynamics, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, USA.
Charles J Frazier
Florida College · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

CB1R independent effects of cannabinoids on synaptic physiology in the CNS.R21DA029828 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI FRAZIER, CHARLES J · 2011 to 2012
$403k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA029828NIDA NIH HHS R21-DA029828
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytocannabinoids isolated from the cannabis plant have broad potential in medicine that has been well recognized for many centuries. It is presumed that these lipid soluble signaling molecules exert their effects in both the central and peripheral nervous system in large part through direct interaction with metabotropic cannabinoid receptors. These same receptors are also targeted by a variety of endogenous cannabinoids including 2-arachidonoyl glycerol and anandamide. Significant effort over the last decade has produced an enormous advance in our understanding of both the cellular and the synaptic physiology of endogenous lipid signaling systems. This increase in knowledge has left us better prepared to carefully evaluate the potential for both natural and synthetic cannabinoids in the treatment of a variety of neurological disorders. In the case of epilepsy, long standing interest in therapeutic approaches that target endogenous cannabinoid signaling systems are, for the most part, not well justified by available clinical data from human epileptics. Nevertheless, basic science experiments have clearly indicated a key role for endogenous cannabinoid signaling systems in moment to moment regulation of neuronal excitability. Further it has become clear that these systems can both alter and be altered by epileptiform activity in a wide range of in vitro and in vivo models of epilepsy. Collectively these observations suggest clear potential for effective therapeutic modulation of endogenous cannabinoid signaling systems in the treatment of human epilepsy, and in fact, further highlight key obstacles that would need to be addressed to reach that goal.

Indexed as

AnimalsCannabinoidsCannabisCerebral CortexEpilepsyHumansSignal TransductionCannabinoids

Identifiers

PMID22178327
PMCPMC3332149
OpenAlexW2146526508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.