ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2011
One-year outcomes using ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results of a prospective and retrospective observational multicentre study.
Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Non-adherence and non-persistence to intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- The NOD audit: Insights into the current state of management for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- Changes in 12-month outcomes over time for age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular oedema and retinal vein occlusion.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- Current and Novel Therapeutic Approaches for Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- Managing Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Clinical Practice: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- A Real-World, Multicenter, 6-Month Prospective Study in Greece of the Effectiveness and Safety of Ranibizumab in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration Who Have Inadequately Responded to Aflibercept: The "ELEVATE" Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Article
- Neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A review of findings from the real-world Fight Retinal Blindness! registry.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2021Review
- Cost-Effectiveness of Conbercept vs. Ranibizumab for Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Diabetic Macular Edema, and Pathological Myopia: Population-Based Cohort Study and Markov Model.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Antagonists: Promising Players in the Treatment of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Drug design, development and therapy · 2021Review
- A 12-month, prospective, observational study of ranibizumab in treatment-naïve Taiwanese patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration: the RACER study.BMC ophthalmology · 2020Observational
- Better visual outcome at 1 year with antivascular endothelial growth factor treatment according to treat-and-extend compared with pro re nata in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Acta ophthalmologica · 2019Article
- Factors Affecting Compliance to Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Patients with Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Turkish journal of ophthalmology · 2017Article
- Efficacy and safety of ranibizumab for wet age-related macular degeneration in Chinese patients.International journal of ophthalmology · 2017Article
- Ranibizumab for the treatment of wet AMD: a summary of real-world studies.Eye (London, England) · 2016Review
- Bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration in Chinese patients in a clinical setting.International journal of ophthalmology · 2016Article
- Visual outcomes of age-related macular degeneration patients undergoing intravitreal ranibizumab monotherapy in an urban population.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2015Article
- Article
- A 2-Year, Phase IV, Multicentre, Observational Study of Ranibizumab 0.5 mg in Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Routine Clinical Practice: The EPICOHORT Study.Journal of ophthalmology · 2014Article
- Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Clinical Findings following Treatment with Antiangiogenic Drugs.Journal of ophthalmology · 2014Article
- Ranibizumab for exudative AMD in a clinical setting: differences between 2007 and 2010.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Swedish Lucentis Quality Registry is a 12-month, open-label, observational, prospective, and retrospective study of ranibizumab administration for wet AMD. Visual acuity (VA) was measured with Snellen or ETDRS chart in 370 patients (66.8% women; age range 46-93 years). In total, a mean of 4.7 ± 1.6 injections per patient (range 1-10) was given to month 12. Mean VA score was 58.3 ± 12.2 letters before treatment, 63.3 ± 12.5 after 3 injections (Δ4.9 ± 10.1 letters from baseline), and 59.3 ± 16.2 at 12 months (Δ1.0 ± 13.6). VA score from baseline to month 12 was stable in 74.4% of patients, improved by 15 letters/3 lines or more in 14.7%, and decreased by ≥15 letters/3 lines in 10.9% of patients. With a mean of 4.7 ranibizumab injections per patient per year, mean VA was stabilised but not increased. To maintain the initial gain seen after the first three injections, an average of 1.8 ± 1.5 additional injections does not appear to be adequate.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.