Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22174663›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2011

Active protein aggregates produced in Escherichia coli.

Spela Peternel, Radovan Komel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Production of recombinant human G-CSF from non-classical inclusion bodies in Escherichia coli.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Production of Active Recombinant Hyaluronidase Inclusion Bodies fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Transient Expression of Dengue Virus NS1 Antigen inFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Enzyme Engineering for In Situ Immobilization.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Spela PeternelLaboratory for Biosynthesis and Biotransformation, National Institute of Chemistry, Hajdrihova 19, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; E-Mail: radovan.komel@mf.uni-lj.si.
Radovan Komel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since recombinant proteins are widely used in industry and in research, the need for their low-cost production is increasing. Escherichia coli is one of the best known and most often used host organisms for economical protein production. However, upon over-expression, protein aggregates called inclusion bodies (IBs) are often formed. Until recently IBs formation represented a bottleneck in protein production as they were considered as deposits of inactive proteins. However, recent studies show that by choosing the appropriate host strain and designing an optimal production process, IBs composed from properly folded and biologically active recombinant proteins can be prepared. Such active protein particles can be further used for the isolation of pure proteins or as whole active protein particles in various biomedical and other applications. Therefore interest in understanding the mechanisms of their formation as well as their properties is increasing.

Indexed as

Protein AggregatesEscherichia coliHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationInclusion BodiesRecombinant ProteinsProtein AggregatesRecombinant Proteinsactive protein aggregatesE. coliIBsinclusion bodies

Identifiers

PMID22174663
PMCPMC3233469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.