Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22174084›Full record

ReviewDevelopmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists2012

Building an ommatidium one cell at a time.

Justin P Kumar

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 193 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cellular innovations and diversity in the lepidopteran compound eye.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. TheFrontiers in neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Closer Look at Histamine inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justin P KumarDepartment of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA. jkumar@indiana.edu
Indiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

Repression of Non-Ocular Fates by the SIX and EYA Genes During Specification and Patterning of the RetinaR01EY014863 · NEI · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI KUMAR, JUSTIN P · 2003 to 2017
$4.3M
NEI NIH HHS 2R01 EY014863NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the discovery of a single white-eyed male in a population of red eyed flies over 100 years ago (Morgan, 1910), the compound eye of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, has been a favorite experimental system for identifying genes that regulate various aspects of development. For example, a fair amount of what we know today about enzymatic pathways and vesicular transport is due to the discovery and subsequent characterization of eye color mutants such as white. Likewise, our present day understanding of organogenesis has been aided considerably by studies of mutations, such as eyeless, that either reduce or eliminate the compound eyes. But by far the phenotype that has provided levers into the greatest number of experimental fields has been the humble "rough" eye. The fly eye is composed of several hundred unit-eyes that are also called ommatidia. These unit eyes are packed into a hexagonal array of remarkable precision. The structure of the eye is so precise that it has been compared with that of a crystal (Ready et al., 1976). Even the slightest perturbations to the structure of the ommatidium can be visually detected by light or electron microscopy. The cause for this is two-fold: (1) any defect that affects the hexagonal geometry of a single ommatidium can and will disrupt the positioning of surrounding unit eyes thereby propagating structural flaws and (2) disruptions in genes that govern the development of even a single cell within an ommatidium will affect all unit eyes. In both cases, the effect is the visual magnification of even the smallest imperfection. Studies of rough eye mutants have provided key insights into the areas of cell fate specification, lateral inhibition, signal transduction, transcription factor networks, planar cell polarity, cell proliferation, and programmed cell death just to name a few. This review will attempt to summarize the key steps that are required to assemble each ommatidium.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrosophila melanogasterErbB ReceptorsGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalOrganogenesisPhotoreceptor Cells, InvertebrateSignal TransductionErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID22174084
PMCPMC3427658
OpenAlexW1581074054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.