Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22173943›Full record

ArticleTransgenic research2012

Welfare assessment in transgenic pigs expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP).

Reinhard C Huber, Liliana Remuge, Ailsa Carlisle, Simon Lillico, Peter Sandøe, Dorte B Sørensen, C Bruce A Whitelaw, I Anna S Olsson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Transgenic research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Reinhard C HuberLaboratory Animal Science Group, Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 823, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal.
Liliana Remuge
Ailsa Carlisle
Simon Lillico
Peter Sandøe
Dorte B Sørensen
C Bruce A Whitelaw
I Anna S Olsson
Copenhagen Business School · DKUniversidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Edinburgh · GBRoslin Institute · GBUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/05251442Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/05251443Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/05251444Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/05251445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since large animal transgenesis has been successfully attempted for the first time about 25 years ago, the technology has been applied in various lines of transgenic pigs. Nevertheless one of the concerns with the technology--animal welfare--has not been approached through systematic assessment and statements regarding the welfare of transgenic pigs have been based on anecdotal observations during early stages of transgenic programs. The main aim of the present study was therefore to perform an extensive welfare assessment comparing heterozygous transgenic animals expressing GFP with wildtype animals along various stages of post natal development. The protocol used covered reproductory performance and behaviour in GFP and wildtype sows and general health and development, social behaviour, exploratory behaviour and emotionality in GFP and wildtype littermates from birth until an age of roughly 4 months. The absence of significant differences between GFP and wildtype animals in the parameters observed suggests that the transgenic animals in question are unlikely to suffer from deleterious effects of transgene expression on their welfare and thus support existing anecdotal observations of pigs expressing GFP as healthy. Although the results are not surprising in the light of previous experience, they give a more solid fundament to the evaluation of GFP expression as being relatively non-invasive in pigs. The present study may furthermore serve as starting point for researchers aiming at a systematic characterization of welfare relevant effects in the line of transgenic pigs they are working with.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedGene ExpressionGene Transfer TechniquesGreen Fluorescent ProteinsSus scrofaGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22173943
OpenAlexW2063669844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.