Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22173879›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2012

Immune reconstitution following unmanipulated HLA-mismatched/haploidentical transplantation compared with HLA-identical sibling transplantation.

Ying-Jun Chang, Xiang-Yu Zhao, Ming-Rui Huo, Lan-Ping Xu, Dai-Hong Liu, Kai-Yan Liu, Xiao-Jun Huang

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Ying-Jun ChangPeking University People's Hospital & Institute of Hematology, Beijing 100044, China.
Xiang-Yu Zhao
Ming-Rui Huo
Lan-Ping Xu
Dai-Hong Liu
Kai-Yan Liu
Xiao-Jun Huang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we prospectively investigated the immune reconstitution in patients with hematological malignancies after human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-mismatched/unmanipulated haploidentical transplantation (50 cases) and HLA-matched transplant (25 cases). Transplant-related mortality, relapse, leukemia-free survival, and overall survival were similar between the two transplant strategies, although the cumulative incidence of CMV antigenemia was significantly higher in haploidentical recipients than in HLA-matched recipients (49.9 ± 7.2% versus 13 ± 7%, P = 0.007). Compared with HLA-matched recipients, T-cell subset and dendritic cell subgroup cell counts in the first 90 days after grafting were lower in haploidentical recipients. The difference was most striking for CD4(+) and CD4(+) naïve T cells. Reconstitution of B cells and monocytes was comparable between groups. T cells appeared equally functional in both groups among patients without graft-versus-host disease. Our results suggest that the clinical outcomes were not compromised by the early delayed immune reconstitution following haploidentical transplantation.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAdultB-LymphocytesCytokinesDendritic CellsFemaleGraft vs Host DiseaseHematologic NeoplasmsHistocompatibilityHLA AntigensHumansInfectionsMaleMiddle AgedSiblingsTime FactorsCytokinesHLA Antigens

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.