ArticleMolecular and cellular biochemistry2012
Ionizing radiation induced signaling of DNA damage response molecules in RAW 264.7 and CD4⁺ T cells.
Article in Molecular and cellular biochemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Melatonin ameliorates zearalenone-induced ovarian damage in mice through antioxidative effects.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Mechanistic study of attenuation of monosodium glutamate mixed high lipid diet induced systemic damage in rats by Coccinia grandis.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Phosphoramide mustard exposure induces DNA adduct formation and the DNA damage repair response in rat ovarian granulosa cells.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ionizing radiation (IR) treatment results in activation of several DNA damage response molecules, such as ataxia telangiectasia, mutated (ATM), and DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNAPK) in mammals that are increasingly recognized for their potential roles in the sensing of DNA damage and initiating the subsequent protein kinase cascade. In vitro evidence indicates that both ATM and DNA-PK are responsible for efficient repair of DNA double strand breaks in response to IR exposure. To unravel the role of ATM and DNA-PK, we studied the mRNA and protein levels of ATM, DNA-PK and their downstream substrates in two different cell types after irradiation viz. macrophage like RAW264.7 cells and CD4(+) T cells isolated from mice spleen. Our results show that despite significant increase in phosphorylation of ATM, its mRNA levels continue to remain low after IR exposure in both the cell types. Conversely, the mRNA expression of DNAPK shows a considerable increase immediately after IR exposure. Moreover, no increase in ATM mRNA levels is seen in DNAPK deficit RAW264.7 cells treated with DNAPK siRNA, indicating that ATM does not undergo any change at its transcriptional levels in response to IR treatment. However, in a similar study in CD4(+) T cells, inhibition of DNAPK by siRNA, shows a considerable increase in ATM after IR exposure. Collectively, these results suggest a discrepancy in the role of the ATM and DNA-PK pathways in the cellular response to IR at the mRNA and protein levels in two different cell types.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.