Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22173359›Full record

ReviewNature chemical biology2011

Bugs, drugs and chemical genomics.

Terry Roemer, Julian Davies, Guri Giaever, Corey Nislow

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature chemical biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Yeast Tools for Studying Type II Topoisomerases in Budding Yeast.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Terry RoemerDepartment of Infectious Disease, Merck, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA. terry_roemer@merck.com
Julian Davies
Guri Giaever
Corey Nislow

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The serendipitous discovery of penicillin inspired intensive research into how small molecules affect basic cellular processes and their potential to treat disease. Biochemical and genetic approaches have been fundamental for clarifying small-molecule modes of action. Genomic technologies have permitted the use of chemical-genetic strategies that comprehensively study compound-target relationships in the context of a living cell, providing a systems biology view of both the cellular targets and the interdependent networks that respond to chemical stress. These studies highlight the fact that in vitro determinations of mechanism rarely translate into a complete understanding of drug behavior in the cell. Here, we review key discoveries that gave rise to the field of chemical genetics, with particular attention to chemical-genetic strategies developed for bakers' yeast, their extension to clinically relevant microbial pathogens, and the potential of these approaches to affect antimicrobial drug discovery.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryGenomicsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID22173359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.