Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22173358›Full record

ReviewNature chemical biology2011

Bacteria and host interactions in the gut epithelial barrier.

Hiroshi Ashida, Michinaga Ogawa, Minsoo Kim, Hitomi Mimuro, Chihiro Sasakawa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature chemical biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 152 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
152citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

152 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  12. Whole Genome Analysis ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Synergistic Anti-Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

92 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hiroshi AshidaDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Michinaga Ogawa
Minsoo Kim
Hitomi Mimuro
Chihiro Sasakawa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut mucosa acts as a barrier against microbial invaders, whereas resident commensal and foreign invading bacteria interact intimately with the gut epithelium and influence the host cellular and immune systems. The epithelial barrier serves as an infectious foothold for many bacterial pathogens and as an entry port for pathogens to disseminate into deeper tissues. Enteric bacterial pathogens can efficiently infect the gut mucosa using highly sophisticated virulence mechanisms that allow bacteria to circumvent the defense barriers in the gut. We provide an overview of the components of the mucosal barrier and discuss the bacterial stratagems that circumvent these barriers with particular emphasis on the roles of bacterial effector proteins.

Indexed as

Host-Pathogen InteractionsAnimalsEpithelial CellsHumansIntestinal MucosaMetagenomeVirulence

Identifiers

PMID22173358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.