ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2012
Evidence-based modeling of network discharge dynamics during periodic pacing to control epileptiform activity.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adaptive control of epileptiform excitability in an in vitro model of limbic seizures.Experimental neurology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a promising therapeutic approach for epilepsy treatment. Recently, research has focused on the implementation of stimulation protocols that would adapt to the patients need (adaptive stimulation) and deliver electrical stimuli only when it is most useful. A formal mathematical description of the effects of electrical stimulation on neuronal networks is a prerequisite for the development of adaptive DBS algorithms. Using tools from non-linear dynamic analysis, we describe an evidence-based, mathematical modeling approach that (1) accurately simulates epileptiform activity at time-scales of single and multiple ictal discharges, (2) simulates modulation of neural dynamics during epileptiform activity in response to fixed, low-frequency electrical stimulation, (3) defines a mapping from real-world observations to model state, and (4) defines a mapping from model state to real-world observations. We validate the real-world utility of the model's properties by statistical comparison between the number, duration, and interval of ictal-like discharges observed in vitro and those simulated in silica under conditions of repeated stimuli at fixed-frequency. These validation results confirm that the evidence-based modeling approach captures robust, informative features of neural network dynamics of in vitro epileptiform activity under periodic pacing and support its use for further implementation of adaptive DBS protocols for epilepsy treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.