ArticleBMC systems biology2011
Reproducible computational biology experiments with SED-ML--the Simulation Experiment Description Markup Language.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
118 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)Autophagy · 2021Guideline
- Specifications of Standards in Systems and Synthetic Biology.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2015Guideline
- Process bigraphs and the architecture of compositional systems biology.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Review
- PEtab Select: Specification standard and supporting software for automated model selection.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- A thermodynamically consistent approach to modeling epithelial solute and water transport in the proximal convoluted tubule.Journal of biological physics · 2026Article
- Who's afraid of synthetic data? Hybrid approaches to deliver medical digital twins.Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2026Article
- Verification and reproducible curation of the BioModels repository.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- The Virtual Brain Ontology: A Digital Knowledge Framework for Reproducible Brain Network Modeling.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Building on models-a perspective for computational neuroscience.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- SBMLtoOdin and Menelmacar: interactive visualisation of systems biology models for expert and non-expert audiences.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- FAIRification of computational models in biology.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Article
- SIMPROV: Provenance capturing for simulation studies.PloS one · 2025Article
- Immune digital twins for complex human pathologies: applications, limitations, and challenges.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2024Review
- Simulation studies of social systems: telling the story based on provenance patterns.Royal Society open science · 2024Article
- Specifications of standards in systems and synthetic biology: status, developments, and tools in 2024.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2024Article
- SimService: a lightweight library for building simulation services in Python.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Article
- Standards, dissemination, and best practices in systems biology.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2023Review
58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe increasing use of computational simulation experiments to inform modern biological research creates new challenges to annotate, archive, share and reproduce such experiments. The recently published Minimum Information About a Simulation Experiment (MIASE) proposes a minimal set of information that should be provided to allow the reproduction of simulation experiments among users and software tools.
resultsIn this article, we present the Simulation Experiment Description Markup Language (SED-ML). SED-ML encodes in a computer-readable exchange format the information required by MIASE to enable reproduction of simulation experiments. It has been developed as a community project and it is defined in a detailed technical specification and additionally provides an XML schema. The version of SED-ML described in this publication is Level 1 Version 1. It covers the description of the most frequent type of simulation experiments in the area, namely time course simulations. SED-ML documents specify which models to use in an experiment, modifications to apply on the models before using them, which simulation procedures to run on each model, what analysis results to output, and how the results should be presented. These descriptions are independent of the underlying model implementation. SED-ML is a software-independent format for encoding the description of simulation experiments; it is not specific to particular simulation tools. Here, we demonstrate that with the growing software support for SED-ML we can effectively exchange executable simulation descriptions.
conclusionsWith SED-ML, software can exchange simulation experiment descriptions, enabling the validation and reuse of simulation experiments in different tools. Authors of papers reporting simulation experiments can make their simulation protocols available for other scientists to reproduce the results. Because SED-ML is agnostic about exact modeling language(s) used, experiments covering models from different fields of research can be accurately described and combined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.