Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22171997›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2012

Family doctor responses to changes in incentives for influenza immunization under the U.K. Quality and Outcomes Framework pay-for-performance scheme.

Evangelos Kontopantelis, Tim Doran, Hugh Gravelle, Rosalind Goudie, Luigi Siciliani, Matt Sutton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The role of the Quality and Outcomes Framework in the care of long-term conditions: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Payment methods for outpatient care facilities.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Increasing the QOF upper payment threshold in general practices in England: impact of implementing government proposals.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Evangelos KontopantelisHealth Sciences Primary Care Research Group, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. e.kontopantelis@manchester.ac.uk
Tim Doran
Hugh Gravelle
Rosalind Goudie
Luigi Siciliani
Matt Sutton
University of York · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Department of Health CDF-2011-04-016Medical Research Council MC_PC_13042Medical Research Council MR/K006665/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the effect of setting higher targets, in a primary care pay-for-performance scheme, on rates of influenza immunization and exception reporting. STUDY

settingThe U.K. Quality and Outcomes Framework links financial rewards for family practices to four separate influenza immunization rates for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, and stroke. There is no additional payment for immunization rates above an upper threshold. Patients for whom immunization would be inappropriate can be excepted from the practice for the calculation of the practice immunization rate. DATA: Practice-level information on immunizations and exceptions extracted from electronic records of all practices in England 2004/05 to 2009/10 (n=8,212-8,403). STUDY

designLongitudinal random effect multilevel linear regressions comparing changes in practice immunization and exception rates for the four chronic conditions before and after the increase in the upper threshold immunization rate for CHD patients in 2006/07. PRINCIPAL

findingsThe 5 percent increase in the upper payment threshold for CHD was associated with increases in the proportion of immunized CHD patients (0.41 percent, CI: 0.25-0.56 percent), and exception was reported (0.26 percent, CI: 0.12-0.40 percent).

conclusionsMaking quality targets more demanding can not only lead to improvement in quality of care but can also have other consequences.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareReimbursement, IncentiveChronic DiseaseEnglandFamily PracticeHumansInfluenza, HumanLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMultivariate AnalysisPatient SelectionPhysician Incentive PlansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Quality Indicators, Health CareState MedicineVaccination

Identifiers

PMID22171997
PMCPMC3423175
OpenAlexW2062644114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.