ArticleBMC clinical pharmacology2011
Price, familiarity, and availability determine the choice of drug - a population-based survey five years after generic substitution was introduced in Finland.
Article in BMC clinical pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Associations between generic substitution and patients' attitudes, beliefs and experiences.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2013Trial
- Comparison between Carprofen and Meloxicam for Post-Neutering Pain Management in Pet Rabbits.Veterinary sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Direct-to-Consumer Drug Advertisement and Prescribing Practices: Evidence Review and Practical Guidance for Clinicians.Journal of general internal medicine · 2021Review
- Reasons for allowing and refusing generic substitution and factors determining the choice of an interchangeable prescription medicine: a survey among pharmacy customers in Finland.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- The content of patient counseling about interchangeable medicines and generic substitution in Finnish community pharmacies - a survey of dispensers.BMC health services research · 2019Article
- The Impact of Information on Doctors' Attitudes Toward Generic Drugs.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing · 2016Article
- Consumers' perception of generic substitution in Iran.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2015Article
- Article
- Generic initiation and antidepressant therapy adherence under Medicare Part D.The American journal of managed care · 2013Article
- A review of the differences and similarities between generic drugs and their originator counterparts, including economic benefits associated with usage of generic medicines, using Ireland as a case study.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2013Review
- Swedish patients' trust in the bioequivalence of interchangeable generics. What factors are important for low trust?Pharmacy practiceArticle
- Glaucoma Medication Preferences among Glaucoma Specialists in Mexico.Journal of current glaucoma practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMandatory generic substitution (GS) was introduced in Finland at the beginning of April 2003. However, individual patients or physicians may forbid the substitution. GS was a significant change for Finnish medicine users. It was thought it would confuse people when the names, colors, packages, etc., changed. The purpose of this study was to explore what medicine-related factors influence people's choice of prescription drugs five years after generic substitution was introduced in Finland.
methodsA population survey was carried out during the autumn of 2008. A random sample was drawn from five mainland counties. A questionnaire was mailed to 3000 people at least 18 years old and living in Finland. The questionnaire consisted of both structured and open-ended questions. Factors that influenced the subjects' choice of medicines were asked with a structured question containing 11 propositions. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed.
resultsIn total, 1844 questionnaires were returned (response rate, 62%). The percentage of female respondents was 55%. Price, availability, and familiarity were the three most important factors that influenced the choice of medicines. For the people who had refused GS, the familiarity of the medicine was the most important factor. For the subjects who had allowed GS and for those who had both refused and allowed GS, price was the most important factor.
conclusionsThe present study shows that price, familiarity, and availability were important factors in the choice of prescription medicines. The external characteristics of the medicines, for instance the color and shape of the tablet/capsule or the appearance of the package, were not significant characteristics for people.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.