Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22171800›Full record

ArticleBMC clinical pharmacology2011

Price, familiarity, and availability determine the choice of drug - a population-based survey five years after generic substitution was introduced in Finland.

Reeta Heikkilä, Pekka Mäntyselkä, Riitta Ahonen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC clinical pharmacology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Impact of Information on Doctors' Attitudes Toward Generic Drugs.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing · 2016
    Article
  8. Consumers' perception of generic substitution in Iran.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Reeta HeikkiläUniversity of Eastern Finland, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Social Pharmacy, P.O.Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Pekka Mäntyselkä *University of Eastern Finland, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Department of Primary Health Care, P.O.Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Riitta Ahonen *University of Eastern Finland, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy, Social Pharmacy, P.O.Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMandatory generic substitution (GS) was introduced in Finland at the beginning of April 2003. However, individual patients or physicians may forbid the substitution. GS was a significant change for Finnish medicine users. It was thought it would confuse people when the names, colors, packages, etc., changed. The purpose of this study was to explore what medicine-related factors influence people's choice of prescription drugs five years after generic substitution was introduced in Finland.

methodsA population survey was carried out during the autumn of 2008. A random sample was drawn from five mainland counties. A questionnaire was mailed to 3000 people at least 18 years old and living in Finland. The questionnaire consisted of both structured and open-ended questions. Factors that influenced the subjects' choice of medicines were asked with a structured question containing 11 propositions. Descriptive statistical analyses were performed.

resultsIn total, 1844 questionnaires were returned (response rate, 62%). The percentage of female respondents was 55%. Price, availability, and familiarity were the three most important factors that influenced the choice of medicines. For the people who had refused GS, the familiarity of the medicine was the most important factor. For the subjects who had allowed GS and for those who had both refused and allowed GS, price was the most important factor.

conclusionsThe present study shows that price, familiarity, and availability were important factors in the choice of prescription medicines. The external characteristics of the medicines, for instance the color and shape of the tablet/capsule or the appearance of the package, were not significant characteristics for people.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorCommerceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDrug CostsDrugs, GenericDrug SubstitutionFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrescription DrugsDrugs, GenericPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID22171800
PMCPMC3262749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.