ArticleDrug, healthcare and patient safety2011
Monoamine depletion by reuptake inhibitors.
Article in Drug, healthcare and patient safety, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibition, an Emergent Treatment for Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2024Review
- Article
- Parkinson's disease managing reversible neurodegeneration.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2016Article
- Administration of supplemental L-tyrosine with phenelzine: a clinical literature review.Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications · 2014Review
- Management of L-dopa overdose in the competitive inhibition state.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2014Article
- Parkinson's disease: carbidopa, nausea, and dyskinesia.Clinical pharmacology : advances and applications · 2014Article
- The discrediting of the monoamine hypothesis.International journal of general medicine · 2012Article
- 5-HTP efficacy and contraindications.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2012Article
- Relative nutritional deficiencies associated with centrally acting monoamines.International journal of general medicine · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2020-12-16Concerns/Issues about Data · Ethical Violations by Author · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Upgrade/Update of Prior Notice(s) ·
- Expression of concern · 2020-04-23Concerns/Issues about Data · Copyright Claims · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Updated to Retraction ·
- Expression of concern
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDisagreement exists regarding the etiology of cessation of the observed clinical results with administration of reuptake inhibitors. Traditionally, when drug effects wane, it is known as tachyphylaxis. With reuptake inhibitors, the placebo effect is significantly greater than the drug effect in the treatment of depression and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, leading some to assert that waning of drug effects is placebo relapse, not tachyphylaxis.
methodsTwo groups were retrospectively evaluated. Group 1 was composed of subjects with depression and Group 2 was composed of bariatric subjects treated with reuptake inhibitors for appetite suppression.
resultsIn Group 1, 200 subjects with depression were treated with citalopram 20 mg per day. A total of 46.5% (n = 93) achieved relief of symptoms (Hamilton-D rating score ≤ 7), 37 (39.8%) of whom experienced recurrence of depression symptoms, at which point an amino acid precursor formula was started. Within 1-5 days, 97.3% (n = 36) experienced relief of depression symptoms. In Group 2, 220 subjects were treated with phentermine 30 mg in the morning and citalopram 20 mg at 4 pm. In this group, 90.0% (n = 198) achieved adequate appetite suppression. The appetite suppression ceased in all 198 subjects within 4-48 days. Administration of an amino acid precursor formula restored appetite suppression in 98.5% (n = 195) of subjects within 1-5 days.
conclusionReuptake inhibitors do not increase the total number of monoamine molecules in the central nervous system. Their mechanism of action facilitates redistribution of monoamines from one place to another. In the process, conditions are induced that facilitate depletion of monoamines. The "reuptake inhibitor monoamine depletion theory" of this paper offers a novel and unified explanation for the waning of response seen after a reuptake inhibitor is started, independent of a drug or placebo etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.