Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22170806›Full record

ArticlePediatric pulmonology2012

A study of the use of impulse oscillometry in the evaluation of children with asthma: analysis of lung parameters, order effect, and utility compared with spirometry.

Hirsh D Komarow, Jeff Skinner, Michael Young, Donna Gaskins, Celeste Nelson, Peter J Gergen, Dean D Metcalfe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Oscillometry for the diagnosis of asthma in children: a systematic review.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Prenatal PMRespirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Validity of fractional exhaled nitric oxide and small airway lung function measured by IOS in the diagnosis of cough variant asthma in preschool children with chronic cough.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Lung Function Tests in Infants and Children.Indian journal of pediatrics · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hirsh D KomarowLaboratory of Allergic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1960, USA. komarowh@niaid.nih.gov
Jeff Skinner
Michael Young
Donna Gaskins
Celeste Nelson
Peter J Gergen
Dean D Metcalfe

Funding

Clinical and Immunological Evaluation of Children with Allergic DiseaseZIAAI000951 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI METCALFE, DEAN D · 2009 to 2010
$681k
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AI000951
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ability to objectively measure lung function in children is critical in the assessment and treatment of asthma in this age group. We thus determined the effectiveness of impulse oscillometry (IOS) as a non-invasive technique to assess lung function in children and in comparison to spirometry for sensitivity and specificity, testing variability, and the order effect of sequential testing of IOS and spirometry.

methodsOne hundred seventeen children sequentially evaluated in a pediatric clinic and under medical care for disease, were asked to perform IOS and spirometry. The utility of IOS and spirometry in differentiating children that had asthma versus those children who did not was then analyzed.

resultsIn the primary analysis (n = 117), bronchodilator response using IOS distinguished asthmatics from non-asthmatics, P = 0.0008 for R10. Receiver-operator characteristic curve (ROC) analysis of R10 bronchodilator response at the best cut-off (-8.6% change) correctly identified 77% of patients with asthma and excluded 76% of non-asthmatics. Amongst those children able to perform spirometry (asthmatics, n = 66; non-asthmatics, n = 16), FEV(1) did not reveal a difference between these two groups, while area of reactance (AX) did distinguish these groups (P = 0.0092). Sequential testing of IOS and then spirometry (n = 47) showed a significant decrement in lung function as determined by IOS following performance of spirometry (P = 0.0309).

conclusionIn the diagnosis and management of children with lung disease, IOS is a non-invasive approach that easily and objectively measures lung impedance and should be considered as both an adjunct, and in some situations, an alternative to standard spirometry.

Indexed as

AdolescentAirway ResistanceAsthmaBronchodilator AgentsCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansLungMaleOscillometryReproducibility of ResultsRespiratory Function TestsSpirometryBronchodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID22170806
PMCPMC3423092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.