Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22170255›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2012

In silico inspired design and synthesis of a novel tubulin-binding anti-cancer drug: folate conjugated noscapine (Targetin).

Pradeep K Naik, Manu Lopus, Ritu Aneja, Surya N Vangapandu, Harish C Joshi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Development of 9-(3 Biotech · 2023
    Article
  4. Noscapine, an Emerging Medication for Different Diseases: A Mechanistic Review.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Journal of pediatric oncology · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pradeep K NaikDepartment of Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA. pknaik1973@gmail.com
Manu Lopus
Ritu Aneja
Surya N Vangapandu
Harish C Joshi
Emory University · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Novel anti-melanoma agents and their mechanism of actionR01CA095317 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI JOSHI, HARISH C · 2005 to 2009
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA-095317-01A2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our screen for tubulin-binding small molecules that do not depolymerize bulk cellular microtubules, but based upon structural features of well known microtubule-depolymerizing colchicine and podophyllotoxin, revealed tubulin binding anti-cancer property of noscapine (Ye et al. in Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:2280-2286, 1998). Guided by molecular modelling calculations and structure-activity relationships we conjugated at C9 of noscapine, a folate group-a ligand for cellular folate receptor alpha (FRα). FRα is over-expressed on some solid tumours such as ovarian epithelial cancers. Molecular docking experiments predicted that a folate conjugated noscapine (Targetin) accommodated well inside the binding cavity (docking score -11.295 kcal/mol) at the interface between α- and β-tubulin. The bulky folate moiety of Targetin is extended toward lumen of microtubules. The binding free energy (ΔG (bind)) computed based on molecular mechanics energy minimization was -221.01 kcal/mol that revealed favourable interaction of Targetin with the receptor. Chemical synthesis, tubulin-binding experiments, and anti-cancer activity in vitro corroborate fully well with the molecular modelling experiments. Targetin binds tubulin with a dissociation constant (K (d) value) of 149 ± 3.0 μM and decreases the transition frequencies between growth and shortening phases of microtubule assembly dynamics at concentrations that do not alter the total polymer mass. Cancer cells in general were more sensitive to Targetin compared with the founding compound noscapine (IC(50) in the range of 15-40 μM). Quite strikingly, ovarian cancer cells (SKOV3 and A2780), known to overexpress FRα, were much more sensitive to targetin (IC(50) in the range of 0.3-1.5 μM).

Indexed as

Anticarcinogenic AgentsBinding SitesCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationComputer SimulationFolate Receptor 1Folic AcidGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLigandsMicrotubulesModels, MolecularNeoplasmsNoscapineProtein BindingProtein ConformationAnticarcinogenic AgentsFolate Receptor 1Folic AcidLigandsNoscapineTubulin

Identifiers

PMID22170255
OpenAlexW2090824388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.