Trial reportNeurosurgical review2012
Effect of magnesium sulfate therapy on patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage using serum S100B protein as a prognostic marker.
Trial report in Neurosurgical review, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness comparisons of drug therapies for postoperative aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients: network meta‑analysis and systematic review.BMC neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Treatment of cerebral vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European radiology · 2017Pooled it
- Biomarkers as outcome predictors in subarachnoid hemorrhage--a systematic review.Biomarkers : biochemical indicators of exposure, response, and susceptibility to chemicals · 2014Pooled it
- Magnesium as an adjunct to nimodipine in subarachnoid hemorrhage: a meta-analysis.Journal of Yeungnam medical science · 2025Article
- Serum concentration-guided intravenous magnesium sulfate administration for neuroprotection in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a retrospective evaluation of a 12-year single-center experience.Neurosurgical review · 2023Article
- Biomarkers in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A short review.World neurosurgery: X · 2023Review
- Heavy Metals and Essential Metals Are Associated with Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers of Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Inhibition of Delayed Cerebral Ischemia by Magnesium Is Insufficient for Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Review
- Neuroprotective Agents in the Intensive Care Unit: -Neuroprotective Agents in ICU.Journal of pharmacopuncture · 2018Review
- Role of Damage Associated Molecular Pattern Molecules (DAMPs) in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (aSAH).International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- The role of magnesium sulfate in the intensive care unit.EXCLI journal · 2017Review
- Controversies and evolving new mechanisms in subarachnoid hemorrhage.Progress in neurobiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnesium, one of the essential trace elements, plays important roles in maintaining both normal cellular and body functions. S100 calcium-binding protein B (S100B) has been used as a marker of glial damage in several neurological disorders. Thirty patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by clipping are included. The patients were randomized within 4 days after the attack of hemorrhage. The patients were divided into two groups with 15 patients in each group. Group I received magnesium infusion within 4 days. Group II is the control group. World Federation of Neurological Surgeons, Fisher, and Glasgow outcome scores are evaluated at an intensive care unit in addition to 3 months clinical follow-up evaluation. Samplings of serum S100B were performed on admission and on postoperative days 1, 3, and 7. There is a statistically significant difference between both groups as regards the second reading of the S100B (day 1 postoperative; P < 0.05). There is no statistically significant difference between both groups as regards outcome at 3 months using clinical status and S100B values. There is a tendency in the magnesium group to have better outcomes. Further studies with more number of patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage are needed to determinate the accuracy of S100B protein as a prognostic marker and of magnesium sulfate as a neuroprotector.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22170177What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.