Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22170172›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2012

Effects of in vivo mechanical loading on large bone defect regeneration.

Joel D Boerckel, Yash M Kolambkar, Hazel Y Stevens, Angela S P Lin, Kenneth M Dupont, Robert E Guldberg

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Novel device for controlled dynamization of tibial fractures: randomized clinical trial.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joel D BoerckelInstitute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Yash M Kolambkar
Hazel Y Stevens
Angela S P Lin
Kenneth M Dupont
Robert E Guldberg
Georgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Vascularization and Bone RepairR01AR051336 · NIAMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GULDBERG, ROBERT E · 2004 to 2007
$999k
NIAMS NIH HHS AR051336NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR051336
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fracture healing is highly sensitive to mechanical conditions; however, the effects of mechanical loading on large bone defect regeneration have not been evaluated. In this study, we investigated the effects of functional loading on repair of critically sized segmental bone defects. About 6-mm defects were created in rat femora, and each defect received 5 µg recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2), delivered in alginate hydrogel. Limbs were stabilized by either stiff fixation plates for the duration of the study or compliant plates that allowed transfer of compressive ambulatory loads beginning at week 4. Healing was assessed by digital radiography, microcomputed tomography, mechanical testing, histology, and finite element modeling. Loading significantly increased regenerate bone volume and average polar moment of inertia. The response to loading was location-dependent with the polar moment of inertia increased at the proximal end of the defect but not the distal end. As a result, torsional stiffness was 58% higher in the compliant plate group, but failure torque was not altered. In single samples assessed for histology from each group, a qualitatively greater amount of cartilage and a lesser degree of remodeling to lamellar bone occurred in the loaded group compared to the stiff plate group. Finally, principal strain histograms, calculated by FE modeling, revealed that the compliant plate samples had adapted to more efficiently distribute loads in the defects. Together, these data demonstrate that functional transfer of axial loads alters BMP-induced large bone defect repair by increasing the amount and distribution of bone formed within the defect.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Bone RegenerationFemaleFemurFinite Element AnalysisInternal FixatorsModels, BiologicalNanofibersRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRecombinant ProteinsSurgical MeshTissue EngineeringBMP2 protein, humanBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Recombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22170172
PMCPMC3307871
OpenAlexW2031155048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.