Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22169619›Full record

SynthesisAddictive behaviors2014

Development of an evidence-based, gay-specific cognitive behavioral therapy intervention for methamphetamine-abusing gay and bisexual men.

Cathy J Reback, Steven Shoptaw

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Addictive behaviors, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04706624 (Screen, Treat and Retain Meth-using People With Opioid Use Disorders at Methadone Clinics), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04706624 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Screen, Treat and Retain Meth-using People With Opioid Use Disorders at Methadone Clinics

TypeinterventionalSponsorHanoi Medical UniversityRan2021 to 2025Enrolled667ConditionsMethamphetamine Abuse, Opioid-use Disorder, HIV SeropositivityArmsContingency management (12 weeks), Contingency management (6 weeks), SMS reminders, Matrix only, Matrix + Contingency management
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cathy J RebackFriends Research Institute, Inc., Los Angeles, CA 90028, United States; UCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90025, United States. Electronic address: reback@friendsresearch.org.
Steven ShoptawUCLA Integrated Substance Abuse Programs, Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90025, United States; Department of Family Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90025, United States.

Funding

BEHAVIORAL THERAPY FOR GAY MALE METHAMPHETAMINE ABUSERSR01DA011031 · NIDA · FRIENDS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. · PI SHOPTAW, STEVEN · 1997 to 2000
$392k
CSAT SAMHSA HHS 1KD1 TI12043NIDA NIH HHS 1R01DA11031NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA011031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared outcomes in methamphetamine use and sexual risk behaviors from a modified gay-specific, cognitive behavioral therapy (GCBT) combined with a low-cost contingency management (CM; [GCBT+CM]) intervention to prior findings from clinical trials of the original GCBT. Effect sizes for primary outcomes were compared using meta analysis. Comparisons of effect sizes at end of treatment showed the modified GCBT+CM produced significantly fewer consecutive weeks of methamphetamine abstinence (-0.44, CI: -0.79, -0.09) and fewer male sexual partners (-0.36, CI: -0.71, -0.02) than the first trial of GCBT, and more days of methamphetamine use (0.35, CI: 0.02, 0.68) than the second trial of GCBT. At 26-week follow-up, the modified GCBT+CM produced greater effects in reducing the number of male sexual partners (-0.54, CI: -0.89, -0.19; -0.51, CI: -0.84, -0.18). The original GCBT produced more and mostly short-term beneficial drug use outcomes, though sexual behavior changes consistently favored the modified GCBT+CM. On balance, most benefits are retained with the modified GCBT+CM intervention.

Indexed as

MethamphetamineAdultAmphetamine-Related DisordersBisexualityCognitive Behavioral TherapyHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk-TakingSexual BehaviorTreatment OutcomeMethamphetamineCognitive behavioral therapyContingency managementGay and bisexual menMethamphetamine abuse treatmentSexual risk behavior

Identifiers

PMID22169619
PMCPMC3326187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.