Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22169089›Full record

ArticleClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2012

Extended safety and efficacy studies of the attenuated Brucella vaccine candidates 16 M(Delta)vjbR and S19(Delta)vjbR in the immunocompromised IRF-1-/- mouse model.

A M Arenas-Gamboa, A C Rice-Ficht, Y Fan, M M Kahl-McDonagh, T A Ficht

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Evaluation of immune responses toFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Preparation and application of aFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  6. Engineering live attenuated vaccines: Old dogs learning new tricks.Journal of translational autoimmunity · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The NOD-Infection and immunity · 2019
    Article
  16. Immune Response to MucosalFrontiers in immunology · 2019
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A M Arenas-GamboaDepartment of Veterinary Pathobiology, Texas A&M University, Texas, USA. aarenas@cvm.tamu.edu
A C Rice-Ficht
Y Fan
M M Kahl-McDonagh
T A Ficht
Texas A&M Health Science Center · US

Funding

WRCE Nonhuman Primate CoreU54AI057156 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI WALKER, DAVID H · 2003 to 2013
$102.6M
NIAID NIH HHS 1U54AI057156-0100NIAID NIH HHS U54 AI057156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global distribution of brucellosis and high incidence in certain areas of the world warrant the development of a safer and efficacious vaccine. For the past 10 years, we have focused our attention on the development of a safer, but still highly protective, live attenuated vaccine for human and animal use. We have demonstrated the safety and protective efficacy of the vaccine candidates 16 MΔvjbR and S19ΔvjbR against homologous and heterologous challenge in multiple immunocompetent animal models, including mice and deer. In the present study, we conducted a series of experiments to determine the safety of the vaccine candidates in interferon regulatory factor-1-knockout (IRF-1(-/-)) mice. IRF-1(-/-) mice infected with either wild-type Brucella melitensis 16 M or the vaccine strain Brucella abortus S19 succumb to the disease within the first 3 weeks of infection, which is characterized by a marked granulomatous and neutrophilic inflammatory response that principally targets the spleen and liver. In contrast, IRF-1(-/-) mice inoculated with either the 16 MΔvjbR or S19ΔvjbR vaccine do not show any clinical or major pathological changes associated with vaccination. Additionally, when 16 MΔvjbR- or S19ΔvjbR-vaccinated mice are challenged with wild-type Brucella melitensis 16M, the degree of colonization in multiple organs, along with associated pathological changes, is significantly reduced. These findings not only demonstrate the safety and protective efficacy of the vjbR mutant in an immunocompromised mouse model but also suggest the participation of lesser-known mechanisms in protective immunity against brucellosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrucellaBrucella VaccineBrucellosisDisease Models, AnimalFemaleInterferon Regulatory Factor-1MiceMice, KnockoutVaccinationVaccines, AttenuatedBrucella VaccineInterferon Regulatory Factor-1Vaccines, Attenuated

Identifiers

PMID22169089
PMCPMC3272933
OpenAlexW2145191798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.