ArticleCancer science2012
Multicellular tumor spheroid formation in duplex microcapsules for analysis of chemosensitivity.
Article in Cancer science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current methods for studying metastatic potential of tumor cells.Cancer cell international · 2022Review
- Multicellular Tumor Spheroids in Nanomedicine Research: A Perspective.Frontiers in medical technology · 2022Article
- Microcapsules and 3D customizable shelled microenvironments from laser direct-written microbeads.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2016Article
- Microtissues in Cardiovascular Medicine: Regenerative Potential Based on a 3D Microenvironment.Stem cells international · 2016Review
- Spherical cancer models in tumor biology.Neoplasia (New York, N.Y.) · 2015Review
- A spheroid-based 3-D culture model for pancreatic cancer drug testing, using the acid phosphatase assay.Brazilian journal of medical and biological research = Revista brasileira de pesquisas medicas e biologica · 2013Article
- An engineered three-dimensional gastric tumor culture model for evaluating the antitumor activity of immune cells in vitro.Oncology letters · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multicellular tumor spheroids (MTS) are gaining increased recognition as valuable tools and key elements in anticancer drug discovery and tumor therapy test programs. However, the lack of reproducible and uniform MTS sizes is a major problem for pharmaceutical assays. Here, we show the usefulness of duplex microcapsules with a Ca-alginate gel membrane as a platform for producing MTS with a highly homogeneous size distribution. HeLa cells were enclosed with 86.9% viability within the microcapsules. The enclosed cells grew and formed MTS with the same size as the cavity of the microcapsules by arresting their growth with the microcapsule membrane. The cells in the resultant MTS had a higher proportion in G(0)/G(1) phase (71.2%) than 2-D cultured cells in the stationary phase (64.3%) or those in MTS formed on a non-adherent surface (65.3%) (P < 0.01). Furthermore, the cells in MTS formed within microcapsules showed higher tolerance to mitomycin C (1-1000 nM) and gemcitabine (4.5-4500 nM) than 2-D cultured cells (P < 0.01). In addition, the expression of MDR1, MCT1, HIF-1α, and GRP78 mRNA was 2.9-, 3.2-, 3.8-, and 5.5-fold higher, respectively, than those in 2-D cultured cells (P < 0.04). Cryopreserved encapsulated cells in the microcapsules showed 80.5% viability and formed MTS with a comparable tolerance of 100 and 1000 nM mitomycin C to those that were not cryopreserved (P > 0.09). These findings suggest the duplex microcapsule may be a promising tool for producing MTS for pharmaceutical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.