Trial reportTrials2011
The utility of Aspirin in Dukes C and High Risk Dukes B Colorectal cancer--the ASCOLT study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Trials, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00565708 (Aspirin for Dukes C and High Risk Dukes B Colorectal Cancers - An International, Multi-Center, Double Blind, Randomized Placebo Controlled Phase III Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Aspirin for Dukes C and High Risk Dukes B Colorectal Cancers - An International, Multi-Center, Double Blind, Randomized Placebo Controlled Phase III Trial
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- An integrated meta-analysis approach to identifying medications with potential to alter breast cancer risk through connectivity mapping.BMC bioinformatics · 2017Pooled it
- Trial
- A New Dawn-Using Teletrials for Early Phase Drug Development: A Practical Guideline.Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Unveiling the "Dark Matter" of platelet involvement in tumor microenvironment.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Review
- The 125th Anniversary of Aspirin-The Story Continues.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Operational Challenges of an Asia-Pacific Academic Oncology Clinical Trial.JCO global oncology · 2023Article
- Colorectal Cancer Chemoprevention: A Dream Coming True?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Colorectal cancer chemoprevention: is aspirin still in the game?Cancer biology & therapy · 2022Review
- Drug repurposing-an emerging strategy in cancer therapeutics.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2022Review
- Aspirin and cancer: biological mechanisms and clinical outcomes.Open biology · 2022Review
- Colorectal Cancer Survivors' Receptivity toward Genomic Testing and Targeted Use of Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs to Prevent Cancer Recurrence.Journal of community genetics · 2022Article
- Aspirin and antiplatelet treatments in cancer.Blood · 2021Article
- Effect of Aspirin on Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Older Adults.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2021Article
- Article
- Aspirin and cancer survival: a systematic review and meta-analyses of 118 observational studies of aspirin and 18 cancers.Ecancermedicalscience · 2021Review
- Implications of lipid droplets in lung cancer: Associations with drug resistance.Oncology letters · 2020Review
- Personalized Medicine-Current and Emerging Predictive and Prognostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer.Cancers · 2020Review
- Chemoprevention of Colorectal Cancer.Gastroenterology · 2020Review
- Antiplatelet Agents for Cancer Prevention: Current Evidences and Continuing Controversies.Cancers · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh quality evidence indicates that aspirin is effective in reducing colorectal polyps; and numerous epidemiological studies point towards an ability to prevent colorectal cancer. However the role of Aspirin as an adjuvant agent in patients with established cancers remains to be defined. Recently a nested case-control study within the Nurses Health cohort suggested that the initiation of Aspirin after the diagnosis of colon cancer reduced overall colorectal cancer specific mortality. Although this data is supportive of Aspirin's biological activity in this disease and possible role in adjuvant therapy, it needs to be confirmed in a randomized prospective trial. METHODS/
designWe hypothesize through this randomized, placebo-controlled adjuvant study, that Aspirin in patients with dukes C or high risk dukes B colorectal cancer (ASCOLT) can improve survival in this patient population over placebo control. The primary endpoint of this study is Disease Free Survival and the secondary Endpoint is 5 yr Overall Survival. This study will randomize eligible patients with Dukes C or high risk Dukes B colorectal cancer, after completion of surgery and standard adjuvant chemotherapy (+/- radiation therapy for rectal cancer patients) to 200 mg Aspirin or Placebo for 3 years. Stratification factors include study centre, rectal or colon cancer stage, and type of adjuvant chemotherapy (exposed/not exposed to oxaliplatin). After randomization, patient will be followed up with 3 monthly assessments whilst on study drug and for a total of 5 years. Patients with active peptic ulcer disease, bleeding diathesis or on treatment with aspirin or anti-platelet agents will be excluded from the study. DISCUSSION: This study aims to evaluate Aspirin's role as an adjuvant treatment in colorectal cancer. If indeed found to be beneficial, because aspirin is cheap, accessible and easy to administer, it will positively impact the lives of many individuals in Asia and globally. TRIALS REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00565708.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.