Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22168267›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2011

The mPED randomized controlled clinical trial: applying mobile persuasive technologies to increase physical activity in sedentary women protocol.

Yoshimi Fukuoka, Judith Komatsu, Larry Suarez, Eric Vittinghoff, William Haskell, Tina Noorishad, Kristin Pham

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01280812 (Applying Mobile Persuasive Technologies to Increase Physical Activity in Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01280812 nacompletednot on this map

Applying Mobile Persuasive Technologies to Increase Physical Activity in Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2011 to 2015Enrolled210ConditionsSedentary Lifestyle, Physical ActivityArmsMobile phone based physical activity intervention with maintenance plus, Mobile phone based physical activity intervention with maintenance regular, Control (pedometer only)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Face-to-face interventions for promoting physical activity.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Behavioral Modeling in Weight Loss Interventions.European journal of operational research · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yoshimi FukuokaInstitute for Health & Aging, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California Street, Suite 340, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. yoshimi.fukuoka@ucsf.edu
Judith Komatsu
Larry Suarez
Eric Vittinghoff
William Haskell
Tina Noorishad
Kristin Pham

Funding

Applying Mobile-Persuasive Technologies to Increase Physical Activity in WomenR01HL104147 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FUKUOKA, YOSHIMI · 2010 to 2014
$3.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL104147NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL104147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the significant health benefits of regular physical activity, approximately half of American adults, particularly women and minorities, do not meet the current physical activity recommendations. Mobile phone technologies are readily available, easily accessible and may provide a potentially powerful tool for delivering physical activity interventions. However, we need to understand how to effectively apply these mobile technologies to increase and maintain physical activity in physically inactive women. The purpose of this paper is to describe the study design and protocol of the mPED (mobile phone based physical activity education) randomized controlled clinical trial that examines the efficacy of a 3-month mobile phone and pedometer based physical activity intervention and compares two different 6-month maintenance interventions.

methodsA randomized controlled trial (RCT) with three arms; 1) PLUS (3-month mobile phone and pedometer based physical activity intervention and 6-month mobile phone diary maintenance intervention), 2) REGULAR (3-month mobile phone and pedometer based physical activity intervention and 6-month pedometer maintenance intervention), and 3) CONTROL (pedometer only, but no intervention will be conducted). A total of 192 physically inactive women who meet all inclusion criteria and successfully complete a 3-week run-in will be randomized into one of the three groups. The mobile phone serves as a means of delivering the physical activity intervention, setting individualized weekly physical activity goals, and providing self-monitoring (activity diary), immediate feedback and social support. The mobile phone also functions as a tool for communication and real-time data capture. The primary outcome is objectively measured physical activity. DISCUSSION: If efficacy of the intervention with a mobile phone is demonstrated, the results of this RCT will be able to provide new insights for current behavioral sciences and mHealth.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov#:NCTO1280812.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneMotivationSedentary BehaviorActigraphyFemaleHumansMotor ActivityProgram Evaluation

Identifiers

PMID22168267
PMCPMC3295748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.