Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22167394›Full record

ReviewSeminars in respiratory and critical care medicine2011

Fungal diagnostics in pneumonia.

Erika D Lease, Barbara D Alexander

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Vulvovaginal candidiasis and current perspectives: new risk factors and laboratory diagnosis by using MALDI TOF for identifying species in primary infection and recurrence.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  5. Diagnosis of Pneumonia Due to Invasive Molds.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  6. The first case ofRespiratory medicine case reports · 2021
    Article
  7. Coinfection ofCase reports in infectious diseases · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with chronic necrotizing pulmonary aspergillosis: a case report.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erika D LeaseDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Barbara D Alexander
Duke Medical Center · US

Funding

Mid-Career Investigator Award: Preventing and Diagnosing Fungal DiseaseK24AI072522 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ALEXANDER, BARBARA D · 2007 to 2011
$583k
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI 072522NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI072522
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fungal pneumonia is increasingly common, particularly in highly immunosuppressed patients, such as solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, and the diagnosis is evolving. Although standard techniques such as microscopy and culture remain the mainstays of diagnosis, relatively recent advances in serological and molecular testing are important additions to the field. This article reviews the laboratory tools used to diagnose fungal respiratory disease.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesFungiGenomicsHumansImmunohistochemistryLung Diseases, FungalMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicroscopyMycological Typing TechniquesPneumoniaProteomics

Identifiers

PMID22167394
PMCPMC4158698
OpenAlexW1977339878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.