Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22167326›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2012

Use of SSR, RAPD markers and protein profiles based analysis to differentiate Eleusine coracana genotypes differing in their protein content.

Anil Kumar, Netrapal Sharma, Preety Panwar, Arun K Gupta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome Editing and Protein Energy Malnutrition.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Gene Discovery and Advances in Finger Millet [Frontiers in plant science · 2016
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anil KumarDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering, College of Basic Sciences & Humanities, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, 263 145, India, anilkumar.mbge@gmail.com.
Netrapal Sharma
Preety Panwar
Arun K Gupta
Govind Ballabh Pant University of Agriculture and Technology · INVivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fifty-two genotypes of Eleusine coracana collected from Uttarakhand hills were subjected to simple sequence repeat (SSR), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR and protein profiling analysis to investigate the variation in protein content. The main objective of the present study was to detect variability among E. coracana and also assess the discriminating ability of these three molecular methods. A total of 21 RAPD and 24 SSR primers were assayed for their specificity in detecting genetic variability in E. coracana, of which 20 RAPD and 21 SSR primers were highly reproducible and were found suitable for use in PCR analysis. Assessing genetic diversity among E. coracana genotypes by RAPD-PCR using 20 polymorphic primers yielded 56 different RAPD markers which clustered the genotypes into different groups on the basis of protein content. Similarly, SSR-PCR with 21 polymorphic primers clustered the genotypes into different groups. On the other hand, biochemical typing of E. coracana using whole seed proteins generated profiles that showed no major difference indicating the technique to be not useful in typing genotypes of this crop. However, a few of the genotypes showed the presence of a unique band of 32 kDa that needs to be further investigated to understand the role of the protein from nutritional point of view, if any. In the present study, significant negative correlation (r = -0.69*) was found between the protein and calcium content of finger millet genotypes. Sodium Dodecyl Sulphate Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis based seed storage proteins generated profiles showed no major differences in banding pattern among 52 finger millet genotypes while quantitative estimation of seed storage protein fractions using Lowry method revealed that glutelin was highest followed by prolamin, globulin and albumin.

Indexed as

ProteomicsRandom Amplified Polymorphic DNA TechniqueCalciumElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelEleusineGenetic MarkersGenotypeMicrosatellite RepeatsPhylogenyPlant ProteinsPolymerase Chain ReactionSeedsCalciumGenetic MarkersPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22167326
OpenAlexW2079163416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.