Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22167300›Full record

ReviewProtoplasma2012

The novel functions of kinesin motor proteins in plants.

Juan Li, Yunyuan Xu, Kang Chong

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Protoplasma, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Multi-Omics Analysis of Small RNA, Transcriptome, and Degradome inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The gymnastics of epigenomics in rice.Plant cell reports · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juan LiResearch Center for Molecular and Developmental Biology, Key Laboratory of Photosynthesis and Environmental Molecular Physiology, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100093, China.
Yunyuan Xu
Kang Chong
Institute of Botany · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kinesin superfamily proteins are important microtubule-based motor proteins with a kinesin motor domain that is conserved among all eukaryotic organisms. They are responsible for unidirectionally transporting various cargoes, including membranous organelles, protein complexes, and mRNAs. They also play critical roles in mitosis, morphogenesis, and signal transduction. Most kinesins in plants are evolutionarily divergent from their counterparts in animals and fungi. The mitotic kinesins in the plant kinesin-5 and kinesin-14 subfamilies appear to be similar to those in fungi and animals. However, others with nonmotor sequences are unique to plants. The kinesins affect microtubule organization, organelle distribution, vesicle transport, and cellulose microfibril order. Ultimately, plant kinesins contribute directly or indirectly to cell division and cell growth in various tissues. Here, we review a novel function of kinesins with transcription activation activity in regulating gibberellin biosynthesis and cell growth. These findings will open exciting new areas of kinesin research.

Indexed as

Cell DivisionGibberellinsKinesinsModels, BiologicalPlant DevelopmentPlant ProteinsPlantsgibberellic acidGibberellinsKinesinsPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID22167300
PMCPMC3389602
OpenAlexW1985227481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.