Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22166723›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2011

Automatic extraction of semantic relations between medical entities: a rule based approach.

Asma Ben Abacha, Pierre Zweigenbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Towards discovery: an end-to-end system for uncovering novel biomedical relations.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Comparison of Natural Language Processing Techniques in Analysis of Sparse Clinical Data: Insulin Decline by Patients.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Towards an Obesity-Cancer Knowledge Base: Biomedical Entity Identification and Relation Detection.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine · 2016
    Article
  11. Identifying Plant-Human Disease Associations in Biomedical Literature: A Case Study.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2016
    Article
  12. CD-REST: a system for extracting chemical-induced disease relation in literature.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Automating the generation of lexical patterns for processing free text in clinical documents.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
  15. Article
  16. A Relation Extraction Framework for Biomedical Text Using Hybrid Feature Set.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Ranking biomedical annotations with annotator's semantic relevancy.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. An exploratory study of user-centered indexing of published biomedical images.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Asma Ben AbachaLIMSI, CNRS, Orsay, F-91403, France. abacha@limsi.fr.
Pierre Zweigenbaum

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformation extraction is a complex task which is necessary to develop high-precision information retrieval tools. In this paper, we present the platform MeTAE (Medical Texts Annotation and Exploration). MeTAE allows (i) to extract and annotate medical entities and relationships from medical texts and (ii) to explore semantically the produced RDF annotations.

resultsOur annotation approach relies on linguistic patterns and domain knowledge and consists in two steps: (i) recognition of medical entities and (ii) identification of the correct semantic relation between each pair of entities. The first step is achieved by an enhanced use of MetaMap which improves the precision obtained by MetaMap by 19.59% in our evaluation. The second step relies on linguistic patterns which are built semi-automatically from a corpus selected according to semantic criteria. We evaluate our system's ability to identify medical entities of 16 types. We also evaluate the extraction of treatment relations between a treatment (e.g. medication) and a problem (e.g. disease): we obtain 75.72% precision and 60.46% recall.

conclusionsAccording to our experiments, using an external sentence segmenter and noun phrase chunker may improve the precision of MetaMap-based medical entity recognition. Our pattern-based relation extraction method obtains good precision and recall w.r.t related works. A more precise comparison with related approaches remains difficult however given the differences in corpora and in the exact nature of the extracted relations. The selection of MEDLINE articles through queries related to known drug-disease pairs enabled us to obtain a more focused corpus of relevant examples of treatment relations than a more general MEDLINE query.

Identifiers

PMID22166723
PMCPMC3239304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.