Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22166267›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2013

Association between local indoor smoking ordinances in Massachusetts and cigarette smoking during pregnancy: a multilevel analysis.

K H Nguyen, R J Wright, G Sorensen, S V Subramanian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Smoke-free legislation and child health.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Substance Use in the Perinatal Period.Current psychiatry reports · 2015
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. An international smoking ban-how many lives will be saved?Current atherosclerosis reports · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

K H NguyenHelen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, 1450 3rd Street, San Francisco, CA 94111, USA. nguyenk@cc.ucsf.edu
R J Wright
G Sorensen
S V Subramanian

Funding

Statewide Communication to Reach Diverse Low Income WomenR01CA129096 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PASICK, RENA JOY · 2007 to 2011
$1.9M
Reducing Social Disparities in Cancer Risk: The Role of Work and Worker HealthK05CA108663 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI SORENSEN, GLORIAN C · 2004 to 2015
$1.5M
Asthma Disparities: Advancing Multilevel Causal ModelsK25HL081275 · NHLBI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI SUBRAMANIAN, SANKARAN VENKATA · 2005 to 2009
$717k
NCI NIH HHS K05 CA108663NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129096NCI NIH HHS R01CA129096NHLBI NIH HHS K25 HL081275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the association between local clean indoor air ordinances and prenatal maternal smoking across 351 municipalities in Massachusetts before the 2004 statewide ban and to test the effect of time since ordinance adoption on the association.

methodsThe authors linked 2002 birth certificate data of women who gave birth in the state and reported a Massachusetts residence (n=67,584) to a database of indoor smoking ordinances in all municipalities. Multilevel regression models accounting for individual- and municipality-level variables estimate the associations between the presence of local smoking ordinances, strength of the ordinances, time since ordinance adoption and prenatal smoking.

resultsCompared with those living in municipalities with no ordinances, women living in municipalities with a smoking ordinance had lower odds of prenatal smoking (OR=0.72, CI=0.53 to 0.98). No effect was found for 100% smoke-free ordinances. For the analyses testing the effect of time, pregnant women living in municipalities with ordinances enacted >2 years were less likely to smoke than those in municipalities with more recent (<1 year) ordinances.

conclusionsPreventing smoking among women of reproductive age is a public health priority. This study suggests that indoor smoking ordinances were associated with lower prenatal smoking prevalence and the favourable effect increased over time. Findings highlight the public health benefit of tobacco control policies.

Indexed as

Prenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAdultAir Pollution, IndoorCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMassachusettsMultilevel AnalysisPregnancySmoke-Free PolicySmokingSmoking PreventionTime FactorsTobacco Smoke PollutionYoung AdultTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID22166267
PMCPMC3401240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.